Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529203›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Deep neural networks effectively model neural adaptation to changing background noise and suggest nonlinear noise filtering methods in auditory cortex.

Gavin Mischler, Menoua Keshishian, Stephan Bickel, Ashesh D Mehta, Nima Mesgarani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reduced Neural Responses to Natural Foreground versus Background Sounds in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Noise schemas aid hearing in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gavin MischlerMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior, Columbia University, New York, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Menoua KeshishianMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior, Columbia University, New York, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Stephan BickelHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York, United States.
Ashesh D MehtaHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York, United States.
Nima MesgaraniMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior, Columbia University, New York, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States. Electronic address: nima@ee.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USHofstra University · US

Funding

Neurophysiology of robust speech perception in human superior temporal gyrusR01DC014279 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Nima MESGARANI · 2015 to 2026
$5.3M
Characterizing the temporal processing of speech in the human auditory cortexR01DC018805 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FLINKER, ADEEN, MESGARANI, NIMA · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Tools for modeling state-dependent sensory encoding by neural populations across spatial and temporal scalesR01EB028155 · NIBIB · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID, STEPHEN V, MESGARANI, NIMA · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028155NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014279NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human auditory system displays a robust capacity to adapt to sudden changes in background noise, allowing for continuous speech comprehension despite changes in background environments. However, despite comprehensive studies characterizing this ability, the computations that underly this process are not well understood. The first step towards understanding a complex system is to propose a suitable model, but the classical and easily interpreted model for the auditory system, the spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF), cannot match the nonlinear neural dynamics involved in noise adaptation. Here, we utilize a deep neural network (DNN) to model neural adaptation to noise, illustrating its effectiveness at reproducing the complex dynamics at the levels of both individual electrodes and the cortical population. By closely inspecting the model's STRF-like computations over time, we find that the model alters both the gain and shape of its receptive field when adapting to a sudden noise change. We show that the DNN model's gain changes allow it to perform adaptive gain control, while the spectro-temporal change creates noise filtering by altering the inhibitory region of the model's receptive field. Further, we find that models of electrodes in nonprimary auditory cortex also exhibit noise filtering changes in their excitatory regions, suggesting differences in noise filtering mechanisms along the cortical hierarchy. These findings demonstrate the capability of deep neural networks to model complex neural adaptation and offer new hypotheses about the computations the auditory cortex performs to enable noise-robust speech perception in real-world, dynamic environments.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAdaptationAuditory neuroscienceDeep neural networksModeling

Identifiers

PMID36529203
PMCPMC10510744
OpenAlexW4312083451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.