Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529182›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2023

Systematic Review: Questionnaire-Based Measurement of Emotion Dysregulation in Children and Adolescents.

Gabrielle F Freitag, Hannah L Grassie, Annie Jeong, Ajitha Mallidi, Jonathan S Comer, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Melissa A Brotman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evidence Base Update on the Assessment of Irritability, Anger, and Aggression in Youth.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle F FreitagFlorida International University, Miami, Florida.
Hannah L GrassieUniversity of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida. Electronic address: hlg54@miami.edu.
Annie JeongNational Institutes of Mental Health, Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ajitha MallidiNational Institutes of Mental Health, Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jonathan S ComerFlorida International University, Miami, Florida.
Jill Ehrenreich-MayUniversity of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Melissa A BrotmanNational Institutes of Mental Health, Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institute of Mental Health · USFlorida International University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Unit on Neuroscience and Novel TherapeuticsZIAMH002969 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BROTMAN, MELISSA · 2019 to 2025
$13.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEmotion dysregulation, understood as a critical transdiagnostic factor in the etiology and maintenance of psychopathology, is among the most common reasons youth are referred for psychiatric care. The present systematic review examined 2 decades of questionnaires used to assess emotion (dys)regulation in youth.

methodUsing "emotion (dys)regulation," PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for empirical, peer-reviewed journal studies published before May 2021 in clinical and/or nonclinical youth. A total of 510 studies met selection criteria and were included.

resultsAcross the literature, 115 distinct self-, parent-, or other informant-reported measures of emotion (dys)regulation were used in cross-sectional (67.1%), longitudinal (22.4%), intervention (9.0%), and mixed design (1.6%) studies. Out of 115 different questionnaires, a subset of 5 measures of emotion (dys)regulation were used in most of the literature (ie, 59.6% of studies). Moreover, reviewed studies examined emotion (dys)regulation in more than 20 distinct clinical groups, further supporting emotion dysregulation as a transdiagnostic construct.

conclusionNumerous themes emerged. Broadly, measures differed in their ability to capture internal vs external components of emotion dysregulation, the use of adaptive vs maladaptive responses, and subjective experiences more broadly vs particular affective states. These findings serve to guide researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate measurement tools for assessing specific domains of child and adolescent emotion dysregulation.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychopathologyAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansParentsSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentchildemotion dysregulationpsychopathologysurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36529182
PMCPMC10267293
OpenAlexW4311460065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.