ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
Fusing 2D and 3D molecular graphs as unambiguous molecular descriptors for conformational and chiral stereoisomers.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning based approaches for structure activity relationship analysis of heparanase inhibitors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- GNN-MA: Soft Molecular Alignment with Cross-Graph Attention for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-View Biomedical Foundation Models for Molecule-Target and Property Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- 3D IntelliGenes: AI/ML application using multi-omics data for biomarker discovery and disease prediction with multi-dimensional visualization.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence to quantitative structure-retention relationship calculations in chromatography.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Target fishing: from "needle in haystack" to "precise guidance"--new technology, new strategy and new opportunity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- SMG-BERT: integrating stereoscopic information and chemical representation for molecular property prediction.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid progress of machine learning (ML) in predicting molecular properties enables high-precision predictions being routinely achieved. However, many ML models, such as conventional molecular graph, cannot differentiate stereoisomers of certain types, particularly conformational and chiral ones that share the same bonding connectivity but differ in spatial arrangement. Here, we designed a hybrid molecular graph network, Chemical Feature Fusion Network (CFFN), to address the issue by integrating planar and stereo information of molecules in an interweaved fashion. The three-dimensional (3D, i.e., stereo) modality guarantees precision and completeness by providing unabridged information, while the two-dimensional (2D, i.e., planar) modality brings in chemical intuitions as prior knowledge for guidance. The zipper-like arrangement of 2D and 3D information processing promotes cooperativity between them, and their synergy is the key to our model's success. Experiments on various molecules or conformational datasets including a special newly created chiral molecule dataset comprised of various configurations and conformations demonstrate the superior performance of CFFN. The advantage of CFFN is even more significant in datasets made of small samples. Ablation experiments confirm that fusing 2D and 3D molecular graphs as unambiguous molecular descriptors can not only effectively distinguish molecules and their conformations, but also achieve more accurate and robust prediction of quantum chemical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.