Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36528737›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Deep-learning-based AI for evaluating estimated nonperfusion areas requiring further examination in ultra-widefield fundus images.

Satoru Inoda, Hidenori Takahashi, Hitoshi Yamagata, Yoichiro Hisadome, Yusuke Kondo, Hironobu Tampo, Shinichi Sakamoto, Yusaku Katada, Toshihide Kurihara, Hidetoshi Kawashima and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Satoru InodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Hidenori TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. takahah-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Hitoshi YamagataDeepEyeVision, Inc, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Yoichiro HisadomeDeepEyeVision, Inc, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Yusuke KondoDeepEyeVision, Inc, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Hironobu TampoDeepEyeVision, Inc, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Shinichi SakamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Yusaku KatadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Toshihide KuriharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Hidetoshi KawashimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Yasuo YanagiDeepEyeVision, Inc, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We herein propose a PraNet-based deep-learning model for estimating the size of non-perfusion area (NPA) in pseudo-color fundus photos from an ultra-wide-field (UWF) image. We trained the model with focal loss and weighted binary cross-entropy loss to deal with the class-imbalanced dataset, and optimized hyperparameters in order to minimize validation loss. As expected, the resultant PraNet-based deep-learning model outperformed previously published methods. For verification, we used UWF fundus images with NPA and used Bland-Altman plots to compare estimated NPA with the ground truth in FA, which demonstrated that bias between the eNPA and ground truth was smaller than 10% of the confidence limits zone and that the number of outliers was less than 10% of observed paired images. The accuracy of the model was also tested on an external dataset from another institution, which confirmed the generalization of the model. For validation, we employed a contingency table for ROC analysis to judge the sensitivity and specificity of the estimated-NPA (eNPA). The results demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 83.3-87.0% and 79.3-85.7%, respectively. In conclusion, we developed an AI model capable of estimating NPA size from only an UWF image without angiography using PraNet-based deep learning. This is a potentially useful tool in monitoring eyes with ischemic retinal diseases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinal DiseasesFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansIschemia

Identifiers

PMID36528737
PMCPMC9759556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.