ArticleScientific reports2022
Deep-learning-based AI for evaluating estimated nonperfusion areas requiring further examination in ultra-widefield fundus images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photobiology in ophthalmology: from evolutionary adaptation to translational therapeutics.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Automated quantification of retinal non-perfusion areas in ultra-widefield SS-OCTA image of patient with retinal vascular diseases by NP-Unet model.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Pixel-Level Segmentation of Retinal Breaks in Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images with a PraNet-Based Machine Learning Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning segmentation of non-perfusion area from color fundus images and AI-generated fluorescein angiography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prevalence of peripheral retinal findings in retinal patients using ultra-widefield pseudocolor fundus imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We herein propose a PraNet-based deep-learning model for estimating the size of non-perfusion area (NPA) in pseudo-color fundus photos from an ultra-wide-field (UWF) image. We trained the model with focal loss and weighted binary cross-entropy loss to deal with the class-imbalanced dataset, and optimized hyperparameters in order to minimize validation loss. As expected, the resultant PraNet-based deep-learning model outperformed previously published methods. For verification, we used UWF fundus images with NPA and used Bland-Altman plots to compare estimated NPA with the ground truth in FA, which demonstrated that bias between the eNPA and ground truth was smaller than 10% of the confidence limits zone and that the number of outliers was less than 10% of observed paired images. The accuracy of the model was also tested on an external dataset from another institution, which confirmed the generalization of the model. For validation, we employed a contingency table for ROC analysis to judge the sensitivity and specificity of the estimated-NPA (eNPA). The results demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 83.3-87.0% and 79.3-85.7%, respectively. In conclusion, we developed an AI model capable of estimating NPA size from only an UWF image without angiography using PraNet-based deep learning. This is a potentially useful tool in monitoring eyes with ischemic retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.