ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023
Are the thickness and ADC values reliable to evaluate pancreas in children? A retrospective MRI study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo define the pancreatic thickness on the transverse plane and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at multiple anatomical locations in the normal pancreas of children and to evaluate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability.
methodsTwo reviewers measured the thickness and ADC values of the pancreas at four locations obtained from two different 1,5 Tesla MRI scanners [MAGNETOM Symphony (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) and Signa HDxt(GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA)]. Measurements were made based on 190 retrospective MRI examinations. Patients were distributed among ten age groups for thickness measurements and three age groups for ADC measurements between 0 and 18 years.
resultsThe thickness measurements from each segment of the pancreas were significantly correlated with patient age, height and weight (p < 0.01). Inter-rater agreement was excellent for pancreatic head (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.837) and good for pancreatic neck, body and tail (ICC: 0.646, 0.632 and 0.678, respectively). We also defined the mean ADC values for three age groups. There was significant difference in the mean ADC value of the head and body by both the vendor and age group (p < 0.05). The mean ADC values and mean ranks of the Signa HDxt were significantly higher and the frequencies were lower than those of the MAGNETOM Symphony at all locations (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe thickness of the pancreatic head is more reliable than that at other locations. Pancreatic body and tail measurements are not as reliable as head or neck measurements due to discrepancies between published studies and low interobserver agreement. ADC values of the normal pancreas can be significantly different among vendors; therefore, ADC comparison on follow-up should be performed using same MRI machine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.