Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36528692›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility.

Lena Rademacher, Dominik Kraft, Cindy Eckart, Christian J Fiebach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neural correlates of asymmetric switch costs during affective task switching.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond risk reduction: Exploring the relation of cognitive control with adolescent positive and negative risk-taking.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Possible application ofMicrobiome research reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lena RademacherDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. lena.rademacher@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-4823
Dominik KraftDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4964-2237
Cindy EckartDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christian J FiebachDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 247/859-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility is frequently linked to resilience because of its important contribution to stress regulation. In this context, particularly affective flexibility, defined as the ability to flexibly attend and disengage from affective information, may play a significant role. In the present study, the relationship of cognitive and affective flexibility and resilience was examined in 100 healthy participants. Resilience was measured with three self-report questionnaires, two defining resilience as a personality trait and one focusing on resilience as an outcome in the sense of stress coping abilities. Cognitive and affective flexibility were assessed in two experimental task switching paradigms with non-affective and affective materials and tasks, respectively. The cognitive flexibility paradigm additionally included measures of cognitive stability and spontaneous switching in ambiguous situations. In the affective flexibility paradigm, we explicitly considered the affective valence of the stimuli. Response time switch costs in the affective flexibility paradigm were significantly correlated to all three measures of resilience. The correlation was not specific for particular valences of the stimuli before or during switching. For cognitive (non-affective) flexibility, a significant correlation of response time switch costs was found with only one resilience measure. A regression analysis including both affective and cognitive switch costs as predictors of resilience indicated that only affective, but not cognitive switch costs, explained unique variance components. Furthermore, the experimental measures of cognitive stability and the rate of spontaneous switching in ambiguous situations did not correlate with resilience scores. These findings suggest that specifically the efficiency of flexibly switching between affective and non-affective information is related to resilience.

Indexed as

CognitionIndividualityAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansReaction TimeSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID36528692
PMCPMC10366320
OpenAlexW4311807848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.