ArticleScientific reports2022
Pre-contrast MAGiC in treated gliomas: a pilot study of quantitative MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Pooled it
- Inter-Individual Differences in TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Intraoperative 3D quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric brain tumour surgery.PloS one · 2026Article
- How useful is contrast-enhanced MRI in the long-term surveillance of glioma? A multicentre retrospective longitudinal cohort study.European radiology · 2025Article
- Clinical Application of MAGiC Method in Distinguishing Between Pituitary Adenoma and Rathke's Cleft Cyst.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of ectopic versus normal gray matter via quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a cross-sectional study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Brain tumor enhancement prediction from pre-contrast conventional weighted images using synthetic multiparametric mapping and generative artificial intelligence.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The value of synthetic MRI in detecting the brain changes and hearing impairment of children with sensorineural hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Standardized brain tumor imaging protocols for clinical trials: current recommendations and tips for integration.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative MR imaging is becoming more feasible to be used in clinical work since new approaches have been proposed in order to substantially accelerate the acquisition and due to the possibility of synthetically deriving weighted images from the parametric maps. However, their applicability has to be thoroughly validated in order to be included in clinical practice. In this pilot study, we acquired Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation scans to obtain T1, T2 and PD maps in 14 glioma patients. Abnormal tissue was segmented based on conventional images and using a deep learning segmentation technique to define regions of interest (ROIs). The quantitative T1, T2 and PD values inside ROIs were analyzed using the mean, the standard deviation, the skewness and the kurtosis and compared to the quantitative T1, T2 and PD values found in normal white matter. We found significant differences in pre-contrast T1 and T2 values between abnormal tissue and healthy tissue, as well as between T1w-enhancing and non-enhancing regions. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the potential of quantitative T1 and T2 values for voxel-wise classification of abnormal/normal tissue (AUC = 0.95) and of T1w enhancement/non-enhancement (AUC = 0.85). A cross-validated ROC analysis found high sensitivity (73%) and specificity (73%) with AUCs up to 0.68 on the a priori distinction between abnormal tissue with and without T1w-enhancement. These results suggest that normal tissue, abnormal tissue, and tissue with T1w-enhancement are distinguishable by their pre-contrast quantitative values but further investigation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.