Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36528673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Pre-contrast MAGiC in treated gliomas: a pilot study of quantitative MRI.

Laura Nunez-Gonzalez, Karin A van Garderen, Marion Smits, Jaap Jaspers, Alejandra Méndez Romero, Dirk H J Poot, Juan A Hernandez-Tamames

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Inter-Individual Differences in TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Nunez-GonzalezRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.nunezgonzalez@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-3631
Karin A van GarderenRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9610-4397
Marion SmitsRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-2871
Jaap JaspersDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-4914
Alejandra Méndez RomeroDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk H J PootRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-2963
Juan A Hernandez-TamamesRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.hernandeztamames@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative MR imaging is becoming more feasible to be used in clinical work since new approaches have been proposed in order to substantially accelerate the acquisition and due to the possibility of synthetically deriving weighted images from the parametric maps. However, their applicability has to be thoroughly validated in order to be included in clinical practice. In this pilot study, we acquired Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation scans to obtain T1, T2 and PD maps in 14 glioma patients. Abnormal tissue was segmented based on conventional images and using a deep learning segmentation technique to define regions of interest (ROIs). The quantitative T1, T2 and PD values inside ROIs were analyzed using the mean, the standard deviation, the skewness and the kurtosis and compared to the quantitative T1, T2 and PD values found in normal white matter. We found significant differences in pre-contrast T1 and T2 values between abnormal tissue and healthy tissue, as well as between T1w-enhancing and non-enhancing regions. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the potential of quantitative T1 and T2 values for voxel-wise classification of abnormal/normal tissue (AUC = 0.95) and of T1w enhancement/non-enhancement (AUC = 0.85). A cross-validated ROC analysis found high sensitivity (73%) and specificity (73%) with AUCs up to 0.68 on the a priori distinction between abnormal tissue with and without T1w-enhancement. These results suggest that normal tissue, abnormal tissue, and tissue with T1w-enhancement are distinguishable by their pre-contrast quantitative values but further investigation is needed.

Indexed as

GliomaWhite MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPilot ProjectsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID36528673
PMCPMC9759533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.