ArticleNature communications2022
Steps dominate gas evasion from a mountain headwater stream.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Steps dominate gas evasion from a mountain headwater stream.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Steps are dominant morphologic traits of high-energy streams, where climatically- and biogeochemically-relevant gases are processed, transported to downstream ecosystems or released into the atmosphere. Yet, capturing the imprint of the small-scale morphological complexity of channel forms on large-scale river outgassing represents a fundamental unresolved challenge. Here, we combine theoretical and experimental approaches to assess the contribution of localized steps to the gas evasion from river networks. The framework was applied to a representative, 1 km-long mountain reach in Italy, where carbon dioxide concentration drops across several steps and a reference segment without steps were measured under different hydrologic conditions. Our results indicate that local steps lead the reach-scale outgassing, especially for high and low discharges. These findings suggest that steps are key missing components of existing scaling laws used for the assessment of gas fluxes across water-air interfaces. Therefore, global evasion from rivers may differ substantially from previously reported estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.