Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36528631›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Personalized prediction of incident hospitalization for cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension using machine learning.

Yuanchao Feng, Alexander A Leung, Xuewen Lu, Zhiying Liang, Hude Quan, Robin L Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanchao FengCentre for Health informatics, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alexander A LeungCentre for Health informatics, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Xuewen LuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Zhiying LiangCentre for Health informatics, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Hude QuanCentre for Health informatics, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Robin L WalkerCentre for Health informatics, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. robin.walker2@ahs.ca.
University of Calgary · CALibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic information for patients with hypertension is largely based on population averages. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of four machine learning approaches for personalized prediction of incident hospitalization for cardiovascular disease among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

methodsUsing province-wide linked administrative health data in Alberta, we analyzed a cohort of 259,873 newly-diagnosed hypertensive patients from 2009 to 2015 who collectively had 11,863 incident hospitalizations for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Linear multi-task logistic regression, neural multi-task logistic regression, random survival forest and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the number of event-free survivors at each time-point and to construct individual event-free survival probability curves. The predictive performance was evaluated by root mean squared error, mean absolute error, concordance index, and the Brier score.

resultsThe random survival forest model has the lowest root mean squared error value at 33.94 and lowest mean absolute error value at 28.37. Machine learning methods provide similar discrimination and calibration in the personalized survival prediction of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. Neural multi-task logistic regression model has the highest concordance index at 0.8149 and lowest Brier score at 0.0242 for the personalized survival prediction.

conclusionsThis is the first personalized survival prediction for cardiovascular diseases among hypertensive patients using administrative data. The four models tested in this analysis exhibited a similar discrimination and calibration ability in predicting personalized survival prediction of hypertension patients.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningProportional Hazards ModelsAdministrative health dataCardiovascular diseaseMachine learningPersonalized prediction, Hypertension patients

Identifiers

PMID36528631
PMCPMC9758895
OpenAlexW4312065798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.