Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36528581›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

The effectiveness of intrauterine antibiotic infusion versus oral antibiotic therapy in the treatment of chronic endometritis in patients during IVF (in vitro fertilization) procedures.

Mihai Luncan, Anca Huniadi, Erika Bimbo-Szuhai, Mihai Botea, Ioana Zaha, Liana Stefan, Corina Beiusanu, Dana Romanescu, Annamaria Pallag, Alin Bodog and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mihai LuncanFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Anca HuniadiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania. ancahuniadi@gmail.com.
Erika Bimbo-SzuhaiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Mihai BoteaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Ioana ZahaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Liana StefanFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Corina BeiusanuFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Dana RomanescuFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Annamaria PallagDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 29 Nicolae Jiga Street, 410028, Oradea, Romania.
Alin BodogFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Laurean Ovidiu PopFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
Mircea Ioan ȘandorFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1St December Square 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania.
University of Oradea · RORomanian Space Agency · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic Endometritis (CE) is a subtle pathology, likely infectious in most cases, with a negative impact on the female fertility, but often overlooked even among fertility specialists. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the predominant infectious nature of CE and to find the best therapeutic option by comparing the results of oral antibiotic therapy versus intrauterine antibiotic infusion in patients with CE undergoing IVF procedures. The objective was to compare the cure rate of CE-defined as the percentage of patients without CE at the test of cure, between the two groups and, the hysteroscopic aspect with the positive CD 138 staining.

methodsThis was a prospective, case-control study that took place in a single university fertility clinic, in Oradea, Romania and included 57 patients with CE divided into 2 groups: orally administered antibiotics group who received a combination of antibiotics compared to intrauterine infusion group who received intrauterine infusion of antibiotic. Chronic Endometritis was diagnosed through hysteroscopy and immunohistochemistry for CD 138. Patients in both groups were tested for CE twice to evaluate the cure rate after oral combination antibiotic therapy versus intrauterine infusion of antibiotic.

resultsOut of 115 patients with endometrial biopsies 57 tested positive for CE, with a 49.6% chronic endometritis prevalence. Among the group that was administered oral antibiotics, 11 patients (45.83%) experienced CE resolution after triple antibiotic therapy. Of the intrauterine infusion group, 25 patients (89.29%) presented negative results (p 0.0020). The normal hysteroscopic aspect had a similar prevalence in the patients with immunohistochemical positive and negative CD 138.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated the effectiveness and superiority of intrauterine antibiotic infusion over the use of oral combination antibiotic therapy for CE cure.

trial registrationISRCTN17542620/14.09.2022.

Indexed as

EndometritisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseEndometriumFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansHysteroscopyPregnancyProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsChronic endometritisHysteroscopyImmunohistochemistry for CD 138Intrauterine antibiotic infusionOral antibiotic therapy

Identifiers

PMID36528581
PMCPMC9759887
OpenAlexW4312067272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.