Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36528557›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Parental information about the option to apply for pregnancy termination after the detection of a congenital abnormality and factors influencing parental decision-making: a cohort study.

Karina Hjort-Pedersen, Annette Wind Olesen, Ester Garne, Pernille Mathiesen Toerring, Chunsen Wu, Lene Sperling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Factors influencing pregnancy decision-making among parents of fetuses with congenital heart disease].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal multidisciplinary counseling for fetal congenital anomalies: A narrative review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karina Hjort-PedersenResearch Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Karina.Hjort-Pedersen2@rsyd.dk.
Annette Wind OlesenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ester GarneDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
Pernille Mathiesen ToerringDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Chunsen WuResearch Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lene SperlingDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKLillebaelt Hospital · DK

Funding

The Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Odense University Hospital 911335The Region of Southern Denmark J.nr. 13/25992The University of Southern Denmark 95-101-12299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of an abnormality during prenatal screening implies that the parents are informed about possible treatment and management of the pregnancy, birth, and postnatal course. This information should enable the parents to make decisions regarding the pregnancy, especially in cases where termination of pregnancy may be an option. The objectives of this study were to investigate how often doctors informed parents about pregnancy termination when the fetus had an anomaly and which demographic factors were related to parental decision-making.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data of fetuses diagnosed with an abnormality during prenatal screening between 2014 and 2016 in Denmark. We categorized the abnormalities into five long-term prognosis groups and analyzed their association with the doctor provided information about termination. We tested the association between demographic variables and parental decisions using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

resultsThree hundred and twenty fetuses were diagnosed with an abnormality. In 67% of these cases, the parents were informed about termination. All parents whose fetus had a lethal prognosis were informed about termination. By comparison, the parents of 98% of fetuses with genetic disorders, 96% of fetuses with poor prognosis, 69% of fetuses with uncertain prognosis, and 12% of fetuses with good prognosis were informed about termination. Of these parents, 92% chose to terminate. A lethal long-term prognosis was the only factor related to parental decision to terminate a pregnancy.

conclusionsDoctors mainly informed parents about the option of pregnancy termination for conditions with a poor or lethal long-term prognosis or for genetic disorders. Only conditions with a lethal prognosis were significantly related to the parental decision to terminate the pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedCongenital AbnormalitiesCohort StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansParentsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesCongenital abnormalitiesParental decisionPrenatal screeningTermination of pregnancyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36528557
PMCPMC9759856
OpenAlexW4312066016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.