ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2022
Annotating TSSs in Multiple Cell Types Based on DNA Sequence and RNA-seq Data via DeeReCT-TSS.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- TEITbase: a database for transposable element (TE)-initiated transcripts in human cancers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- AI-Based Prediction of Gene Expression in Single-Cell and Multiscale Genomics and Transcriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deep learning for regulatory genomics: a survey of models, challenges, and applications.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- AI-powered precision medicine: utilizing genetic risk factor optimization to revolutionize healthcare.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Overview and Prospects of DNA Sequence Visualization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- An AI Agent for Fully Automated Multi-Omic Analyses.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Omics.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate annotation of transcription start sites (TSSs) and their usage are critical for the mechanistic understanding of gene regulation in different biological contexts. To fulfill this, specific high-throughput experimental technologies have been developed to capture TSSs in a genome-wide manner, and various computational tools have also been developed for in silico prediction of TSSs solely based on genomic sequences. Most of these computational tools cast the problem as a binary classification task on a balanced dataset, thus resulting in drastic false positive predictions when applied on the genome scale. Here, we present DeeReCT-TSS, a deep learning-based method that is capable of identifying TSSs across the whole genome based on both DNA sequence and conventional RNA sequencing data. We show that by effectively incorporating these two sources of information, DeeReCT-TSS significantly outperforms other solely sequence-based methods on the precise annotation of TSSs used in different cell types. Furthermore, we develop a meta-learning-based extension for simultaneous TSS annotations on 10 cell types, which enables the identification of cell type-specific TSSs. Finally, we demonstrate the high precision of DeeReCT-TSS on two independent datasets by correlating our predicted TSSs with experimentally defined TSS chromatin states. The source code for DeeReCT-TSS is available at https://github.com/JoshuaChou2018/DeeReCT-TSS_release and https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/biocode/tools/BT007316.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.