Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2023
Favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (PIONEER trial): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial of early intervention versus standard care.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04373733 (A Randomised Controlled Trial of Early Intervention in Patients HospItalised With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Early Intervention in Patients HospItalised With COVID-19: Favipiravir and StaNdard Care vErsEs Standard CaRe
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating dose and time of fluvoxamine treatment efficacy for COVID-19 clinical deterioration, death, and Long-COVID complications.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Favipiravir for treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Hitting Coronaviruses Where It Hurts: Antiviral Strategies Targeting Viral Proteins.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- The relationship between plasma favipiravir concentrations and clinical outcomes in COVID-19.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Polymerase-inhibitor drug synergy and mutational signatures in different epithelial cell models of RSVA and hPIV3 infection.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- Anti-COVID-19 activity and simple HPLC method for concurrent detection of repurposed drugs in novel binary mixtures.AMB Express · 2026Article
- Favipiravir treatment in Thai children with COVID-19: effectiveness, safety, and modeling drug exposure.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2026Article
- Review
- Favipiravir as a potent inhibitor of Newcastle disease virus:Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Dysregulated glycerophospholipid metabolism in amygdala may mediate favipiravir-induced anxiety-like behaviors in mice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Observational
- Antivirals in COVID-19: A Focus on Pediatric Cardiac Patients.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025Review
- Favipiravir pharmacokinetics in Thai adults with mild COVID-19: A sub-study of interpatient variability and ethnic differences in exposure.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Article
- Advancements in Antiviral Therapy: Favipiravir Sodium in Nasal Formulation.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Article
- Comparative Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Disposition of Favipiravir Following Pulmonary and Oral Administration as Potential Adjunct Therapy Against Airborne RNA Viruses.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Adverse drug reactions associated with COVID-19 management.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- Structural and virologic mechanism of the emergence of resistance to MProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Lessons learnt from broad-spectrum coronavirus antiviral drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2024Review
- A novel LC-MS/MS method for the determination of favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5'-triphosphate (T-705-RTP) in human peripheral mononuclear cells.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of favipiravir in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (FAVID).Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 has overwhelmed health services globally. Oral antiviral therapies are licensed worldwide, but indications and efficacy rates vary. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.
methodsWe conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of oral favipiravir in adult patients who were newly admitted to hospital with proven or suspected COVID-19 across five sites in the UK (n=2), Brazil (n=2) and Mexico (n=1). Using a permuted block design, eligible and consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily for 1 day; 800 mg twice daily for 9 days) plus standard care, or standard care alone. All caregivers and patients were aware of allocation and those analysing data were aware of the treatment groups. The prespecified primary outcome was the time from randomisation to recovery, censored at 28 days, which was assessed using an intention-to-treat approach. Post-hoc analyses were used to assess the efficacy of favipiravir in patients aged younger than 60 years, and in patients aged 60 years and older. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04373733.
findingsBetween May 5, 2020 and May 26, 2021, we assessed 503 patients for eligibility, of whom 499 were randomly assigned to favipiravir and standard care (n=251) or standard care alone (n=248). There was no significant difference between those who received favipiravir and standard care, relative to those who received standard care alone in time to recovery in the overall study population (hazard ratio [HR] 1·06 [95% CI 0·89-1·27]; n=499; p=0·52). Post-hoc analyses showed a faster rate of recovery in patients younger than 60 years who received favipiravir and standard care versus those who had standard care alone (HR 1·35 [1·06-1·72]; n=247; p=0·01). 36 serious adverse events were observed in 27 (11%) of 251 patients administered favipiravir and standard care, and 33 events were observed in 27 (11%) of 248 patients receiving standard care alone, with infectious, respiratory, and cardiovascular events being the most numerous. There was no significant between-group difference in serious adverse events per patient (p=0·87).
interpretationFavipiravir does not improve clinical outcomes in all patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, however, patients younger than 60 years might have a beneficial clinical response. The indiscriminate use of favipiravir globally should be cautioned, and further high-quality studies of antiviral agents, and their potential treatment combinations, are warranted in COVID-19.
fundingLifeArc and CW+.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.