Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527839›Full record

ArticleVision research2023

Consistency of preferred retinal locus across tasks and participants trained with a simulated scotoma.

Marcello Maniglia, Kristina M Visscher, Aaron R Seitz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How People With Vision Impairment Use Their Gaze to Hit a Ball.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello ManigliaDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: mmanig@ucr.edu.
Kristina M VisscherDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Aaron R SeitzDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
University of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Characterization of Multiple Factors in Training and Plasticity in Central Vision LossR01EY031589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SEITZ, AARON R, TURK-BROWNE, NICHOLAS BENJAMIN · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
Changes in Visual Cortical Connectivity Following Central Visual Field LossU01EY025858 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI VISSCHER, KRISTINA · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
New methods to quantify and train eye movement strategies in macular degenerationR21EY033623 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI MANIGLIA, MARCELLO, SEITZ, AARON R · 2022 to 2023
$414k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031589NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033623NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After loss of central vision following retinal pathologies such as macular degeneration (MD), patients often adopt compensatory strategies including developing a "preferred retinal locus" (PRL) to replace the fovea in tasks involving fixation. A key question is whether patients develop multi-purpose PRLs or whether their oculomotor strategies adapt to the demands of the task. While most MD patients develop a PRL, clinical evidence suggests that patients may develop multiple PRLs and switch between them according to the task at hand. To understand this, we examined a model of central vision loss in normally seeing individuals and tested whether they used the same or different PRLs across tasks after training. Nineteen participants trained for 10 sessions on contrast detection while in conditions of gaze-contingent, simulated central vision loss. Before and after training, peripheral looking strategies were evaluated during tasks measuring visual acuity, reading abilities and visual search. To quantify strategies in these disparate, naturalistic tasks, we measured and compared the amount of task-relevant information at each of 8 equally spaced, peripheral locations, while participants performed the tasks. Results showed that some participants used consistent viewing strategies across tasks whereas other participants' strategies differed depending on task. This novel method allows quantification of peripheral vision use even in relatively ecological tasks. These results represent one of the first examinations of peripheral viewing strategies across tasks in simulated vision loss. Results suggest that individual differences in peripheral looking strategies following simulated central vision loss may model those developed in pathological vision loss.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationScotomaEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansRetinaVision DisordersVisual PerceptionCentral vision lossEye movementsMacular DegenerationPeripheral vision

Identifiers

PMID36527839
PMCPMC9914520
OpenAlexW4311564844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.