ArticleUltrasonics2023
Synthetic radial aperture focusing to regulate manual volumetric scanning for economic transrectal ultrasound imaging.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arc-to-line frame registration method for ultrasound and photoacoustic image-guided intraoperative robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we present a volumetric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging under the presence of radial scanning angle disorientation (SAD) in a resource-limited diagnostic setting. Herein, we test our hypothesis that a synthetic radial aperture focusing (TRUS-rSAF) technique, in which a radial plane in target volume is reconstructed by coherent compounding of multiple transmittance/reception events, will reject a randomized SAD in a free-hand scanning setup based on external angular tracking. Based on an analytical model of the TRUS-rSAF technique, we first tested specific scenarios using a clinically available TRUS transducer under different SADs in a range of normal distributions (σ = 0.1°, 0.2°, 0.5°, 1°, 2°, and 5°). We found a benefit of the TRUS-rSAF technique for higher robustness when the SAD is contained within the radial synthetic aperture window, i.e., ±0.71° from a target scanning angle. However, no enhancement was found in spatial resolution because of the limited transmit beam field of the clinical TRUS transducer, limiting the synthetic aperture window. We further evaluated the TRUS-rSAF technique with a modified TRUS transducer for an extended synthetic aperture window to test whether higher spatial resolution and robustness to SAD can be obtained in the same evaluation setup. Widening of the synthetic aperture window (±3.54°, ± 5.91°, ± 8.27°, ± 10.63°, ± 12.99°, ± 15.35°) resulted in proportional enhancements of spatial resolution, but it also progressively built up sidelobe artifacts due to randomized synthesis with limited phase cancellations. The results suggest the need for careful calibration of the TRUS-rSAF technique to enable TRUS imaging with free-hand radial scanning and external angle tracking in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.