Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527807›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2023

Heterogeneity and lyophilization comparison of stool processing for gastrointestinal bile acid measurement by LC-MS/MS.

Chenlin Hu, Weiqun Wang, Kevin W Garey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Repurposing dried blood spot device technology to examine bile acid profiles in human dried fecal spot samples.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chenlin HuUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Weiqun WangUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Kevin W GareyUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: kgarey@uh.edu.
University of Houston · US

Funding

Decoding Antibiotic-induced Susceptibility to Clostridium difficile InfectionU01AI124290 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BRITTON, ROBERT A, GAREY, KEVIN W · 2016 to 2020
$7.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI124290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal bile acid (BA) analysis is an emerging area of gut microbiome research. However, sample preparation procedures for fecal BA analysis are not standardized. Current fecal BA analysis often utilizes either original or lyophilized aliquot, and fecal BA result difference between these two processing steps remains not systematically investigated. Moreover, the distribution pattern of fecal BA in the collected stool sample also remains unclear but affects interpretation of fecal BA for downstream experiments. To address these two questions regarding effect of lyophilization on fecal BA and fecal heterogeneity, fourteen separate BAs were quantified from 60 aliquots obtained from 10 clinical fecal samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). BA concentrations in the lyophilized sample were typically 2-4 folds higher than those in the original sample, but were almost identical using a water-adjusted lyophilized BA concentration. The fecal BA compositional profile and four BA ratios were similar utilizing either the original or lyophilized samples. BA concentrations were similar among different aliquots of differing starting mass except for the relatively trace-level BA. Therefore, it is suggested that fecal BA concentrations should be presented as the original sample concentration or water-adjusted lyophilization concentration to allow comparisons between studies. A single aliquot (20-100 mg) of stool can be used to reflect the concentrations in the entire sample. These results help to standardize analyses in this emerging field.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidFecesFreeze DryingBile Acids and SaltsChenodeoxycholateCholateDeoxycholateMetabolomicsMicrobiomeTaurocholate

Identifiers

PMID36527807
PMCPMC9839599
OpenAlexW4311770296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.