ArticleBiomaterials2023
Efficient in vivo neuronal genome editing in the mouse brain using nanocapsules containing CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins.
Article in Biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- uPAR exhibits age- and region-dependent expression in the brains of mice with Alzheimer's disease-like pathology.Brain research · 2026Article
- A combinatorial synthetic strategy for developing genome-editing protein-delivery agents targeting mouse retina.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Mechanotransduction-Epigenetic Coupling in Pulmonary Regeneration: Multifunctional Bioscaffolds as Emerging Tools.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Controlling CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells using a molecular glue degrader.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Variable Neuronal Expression of Green Florescent Protein in the Brain of a Transgenic Swine Reporter Model.Next research · 2025Article
- Precisely Targeted Nanoparticles for CRISPR-Cas9 Delivery in Clinical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins (Cas9 RNPs) into Cells via Nanoparticles for Membrane Transport.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Fast-spiking parvalbumin-positive interneurons: new perspectives of treatment and future challenges in dementia.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas technologies in neurodegenerative disorders: mechanistic insights, therapeutic potential, and translational challenges.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- The association between social determinants, lifestyle and metabolic factors and the onset of secondary glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis: a cohort study of adults in the UK.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Widespread Gene Editing in the Brain via In Utero Delivery of mRNA Using Acid-Degradable Lipid Nanoparticles.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Perspectives on CRISPR Genome Editing to Prevent Prion Diseases in High-Risk Individuals.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Engineering self-deliverable ribonucleoproteins for genome editing in the brain.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Self-delivering, chemically modified CRISPR RNAs for AAV co-delivery and genome editing in vivo.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of non-viral gene editing technology to the brain.Progress in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Smart antioxidant function enhancing (SAFE) nucleic acid therapy for ROS-related chronic diseases and comorbidities.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Genome editing in the mouse brain with minimally immunogenic Cas9 RNPs.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Tissue-Specific In Vivo Targeting: Nanomaterials and Translational Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Non-viral approaches for gene therapy and therapeutic genome editing across the blood-brain barrier.Med-X · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genome editing of somatic cells via clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) offers promise for new therapeutics to treat a variety of genetic disorders, including neurological diseases. However, the dense and complex parenchyma of the brain and the post-mitotic state of neurons make efficient genome editing challenging. In vivo delivery systems for CRISPR-Cas proteins and single guide RNA (sgRNA) include both viral vectors and non-viral strategies, each presenting different advantages and disadvantages for clinical application. We developed non-viral and biodegradable PEGylated nanocapsules (NCs) that deliver preassembled Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). Here, we show that the RNP NCs led to robust genome editing in neurons following intracerebral injection into the healthy mouse striatum. Genome editing was predominantly observed in medium spiny neurons (>80%), with occasional editing in cholinergic, calretinin, and parvalbumin interneurons. Glial activation was minimal and was localized along the needle tract. Our results demonstrate that the RNP NCs are capable of safe and efficient neuronal genome editing in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.