Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527722›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2023

Development of deep-inspiration breath-hold system that monitors the position of the chest wall using infrared rangefinder.

Masaki Oshima, Naoto Shikama, Keisuke Usui, Shuko Nojiri, Akira Isobe, Yoichi Muramoto, Terufumi Kawamoto, Nanae Yamaguchi, Yasuo Kosugi, Keisuke Sasai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masaki OshimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Naoto ShikamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Keisuke UsuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Shuko NojiriMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Akira IsobeDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Hospital, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Yoichi MuramotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Terufumi KawamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Nanae YamaguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Yasuo KosugiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Keisuke SasaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 21-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a prospective study to quantitatively evaluate the movement of the chest wall to establish the simple and reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) method. The left nipple position was monitored to confirm the inspiratory state. Planning computed tomography (CT) was performed under DIBH and free-breath. We conducted radiation plans with DIBH and free-breath CT and evaluated organ at risk (OAR) and target doses according to two different plans. The relationship between positioning errors of the chest wall and patient factors was evaluated using univariate analysis and fixed-effects models. Twenty-three patients aged ≤ 60 years were enrolled during January-August 2021; 358 daily radiation treatments were evaluated. The median time of treatment room occupancy was 16 minutes (interquartile range, 14-20). The area of the planning target volume (PTV) surrounded by the 95% isodose line was more extensive in DIBH than in free breathing (71.6% vs 69.5%, P < 0.01), whereas the cardiac and left anterior descending (LAD) artery doses were lower (both P < 0.01). In the fixed-effects model analysis, the occupation time of the treatment room was correlated with positioning error. The difference between the planned and irradiated dose was the largest in the LAD branch of the coronary artery (-2.5 Gy), although the OAR dose decreased owing to positional error. The current DIBH method, wherein a single point on the chest wall is monitored to confirm that the patient is in an inspiratory state, allows radiation to be performed in a short time with a small dose error.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsThoracic WallUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHeartHumansMovementOrgans at RiskProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespirationbreast cancercardiac toxicitydeep-inspiration breath holdingradiotherapyreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID36527722
PMCPMC9855317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.