Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527688›Full record

SynthesisGenome biology and evolution2023

Co-expression Gene Networks and Machine-learning Algorithms Unveil a Core Genetic Toolkit for Reproductive Division of Labour in Rudimentary Insect Societies.

Emeline Favreau, Katherine S Geist, Christopher D R Wyatt, Amy L Toth, Seirian Sumner, Sandra M Rehan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The origin and maintenance of division of labour in an Indian paper wasp.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The Molecular Substrates of Insect Eusociality.Annual review of genetics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emeline FavreauDepartment of Genetics, Environment, Evolution, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-500X
Katherine S GeistDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Christopher D R WyattDepartment of Genetics, Environment, Evolution, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Amy L TothDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Seirian SumnerDepartment of Genetics, Environment, Evolution, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Sandra M RehanDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
University College London · GBIowa State University · USYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of eusociality requires that individuals forgo some or all their own reproduction to assist the reproduction of others in their group, such as a primary egg-laying queen. A major open question is how genes and genetic pathways sculpt the evolution of eusociality, especially in rudimentary forms of sociality-those with smaller cooperative nests when compared with species such as honeybees that possess large societies. We lack comprehensive comparative studies examining shared patterns and processes across multiple social lineages. Here we examine the mechanisms of molecular convergence across two lineages of bees and wasps exhibiting such rudimentary societies. These societies consist of few individuals and their life histories range from facultative to obligately social. Using six species across four independent origins of sociality, we conduct a comparative meta-analysis of publicly available transcriptomes. Standard methods detected little similarity in patterns of differential gene expression in brain transcriptomes among reproductive and non-reproductive individuals across species. By contrast, both supervised machine learning and consensus co-expression network approaches uncovered sets of genes with conserved expression patterns among reproductive and non-reproductive phenotypes across species. These sets overlap substantially, and may comprise a shared genetic "toolkit" for sociality across the distantly related taxa of bees and wasps and independently evolved lineages of sociality. We also found many lineage-specific genes and co-expression modules associated with social phenotypes and possible signatures of shared life-history traits. These results reveal how taxon-specific molecular mechanisms complement a core toolkit of molecular processes in sculpting traits related to the evolution of eusociality.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksWaspsAnimalsBeesMachine LearningReproductionSocial BehaviorTranscriptomebeescastesRNAseqsimple societiessocial insectssocialitySVMwasps

Identifiers

PMID36527688
PMCPMC9830183
OpenAlexW4311794314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.