ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Cardiovascular Risk Score and Pulmonary Gas Exchange in COVID-19 Patients Show No Correlation.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung Ultrasound Is Useful for Evaluating Lung Damage in COVID-19 Patients Treated with Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab: A Single-Center Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 induces robust systemic inflammation. Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at an increased risk of death. However, much effort is being spent to identify possible predictors of negative outcomes in order to have a more specific clinical setting. CVD scores are a useful tool in evaluating risk of cardiovascular events.
aimWe evaluated oxygenation and characteristics in COVID-19 patients according to cardiovascular risk stratification performed using the Framingham risk score (FRS) for cardiovascular disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe evaluated 155 COVID-19 patients (110 males and 45 females, aged 67.43 ± 14.72 years). All patients underwent a complete physical examination, chest imaging, laboratory tests and blood gas analysis at the time of diagnosis. Seventeen patients died (10 males and 7 females, aged 74.71 ± 7.23 years) while the remaining 138 patients (100 males and 38 females, aged 66.07 ± 15.16 years) were alive at discharge.
resultsDeceased patients have an increased FRS compared to those that survived (27.37 ± 5.03 vs. 21.33 ± 9.49, p < 0.05). Compared to survivors, the deceased group presents with a significant increase in white blood cells (p < 0.05) and D-dimers (p < 0.05). There was no difference in pCO DISCUSSION: CVD may be considered as a major risk factor for death in COVID-19 patients. The increased risk relates to a reduced lung capacity but it is not related to blood gas values. Similarly, CV risk score results are independent from the inflammatory status of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.