Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527472›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation in post-stroke patients using machine learning: a French nationwide study.

Arnaud Bisson, Yassine Lemrini, Wahbi El-Bouri, Alexandre Bodin, Denis Angoulvant, Gregory Y H Lip, Laurent Fauchier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Performance of risk models to predict mortality risk for patients with heart failure: evaluation in an integrated health system.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arnaud BissonService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France. arnaud.bisson@univ-tours.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3449-1800
Yassine LemriniService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France.
Wahbi El-BouriLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Alexandre BodinService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France.
Denis Angoulvant *Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France.
Gregory Y H Lip *Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Laurent Fauchier *Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeting ischemic strokes patients at risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) for prolonged cardiac monitoring and oral anticoagulation remains a challenge. Clinical risk scores have been developed to predict post-stroke AF with suboptimal performances. Machine learning (ML) models are developing in the field of AF prediction and may be used to discriminate post-stroke patients at risk of new onset AF. This study aimed to evaluate ML models for the prediction of AF and to compare predictive ability to usual clinical scores.

methodsBased on a French nationwide cohort of 240,459 ischemic stroke patients without AF at baseline from 2009 to 2012, ML models were trained on a train set and the best model was selected to be evaluate on the test set. Discrimination of the best model was evaluated using the C index. We finally compared our best model with previously described clinical scores.

resultsDuring a mean follow-up of 7.9 ± 11.5 months, 14,095 patients (mean age 77.6 ± 10.6; 50.3% female) developed incident AF. After training, the best ML model selected was a deep neural network with a C index of 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78) on the test set. Compared to traditional clinical scores, the selected model was statistically significantly superior to the CHA

conclusionsML algorithms predict incident AF post-stroke with a better ability than previously developed clinical scores. AF: atrial fibrillation; DNN: deep neural network; IS: ischemic stroke; KNN: K-nearest neighbors; LR: logistic regression; RFC: random forest classifier; XGBoost: extreme gradient boosting.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationIschemic StrokeStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAtrial fibrillationIschemic strokeMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID36527472
OpenAlexW4311823686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.