Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527435›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

The added value of the nurse practitioner: An evolutionary concept analysis.

Isabelle Savard, Grace Al Hakim, Kelley Kilpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabelle SavardIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8360-6232
Grace Al HakimIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5055-6846
Kelley KilpatrickIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2137-6560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimNurse practitioners' added value is often mentioned in publications, but there is no consensus on what value is being added, what value is being added to, and in comparison with what can be considered to be an added value. A concept analysis was conducted to clarify the attributes, antecedents and meaning and better understand the Nurse practitioners' added value.

designRodgers' evolutionary concept analysis.

methodsWe selected 16 studies from CINAHL, PubMed, Embase and Medline to conduct a thematic analysis, considering the date, location and discipline of publications.

resultsNurse practitioners' added value include: skills and competencies, activities performed, positive outcomes, and positive role perceptions, and antecedents and consequences were also identified. Nurse practitioners' added value is context-dependent and is often understood by comparing it to a context prior to implementation or other professional roles.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersConsensusHumansMEDLINEProfessional RolePubMedadded valueadvanced practicecompetenciesconcept analysisnurse practitionersnursingoutcomesskills

Identifiers

PMID36527435
PMCPMC10006655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.