Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527368›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2023

Cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A consensus statement.

Harald Hegen, Georgina Arrambide, Sharmilee Gnanapavan, Batia Kaplan, Michael Khalil, Ruba Saadeh, Charlotte Teunissen, Hayrettin Tumani, Luisa Maria Villar, Maria Alice V Willrich and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Is there a link between multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer disease? A critical note.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Harald HegenDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Georgina ArrambideServei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2657-5510
Sharmilee GnanapavanBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2817-9922
Batia KaplanLaboratory of Hematology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Michael KhalilDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-3328
Ruba SaadehDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA/Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Charlotte TeunissenNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Program Neuroinflammation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4061-0837
Hayrettin TumaniCSF Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Luisa Maria VillarBiostatistics Unit, Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Alice V WillrichDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden/Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden/Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK/UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK/Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hong Kong, China.
Florian DeisenhammerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-8841
Innsbruck Medical University · ATMayo Clinic in Arizona · USAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESMedical University of Graz · ATQueen Mary University of London · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESheba Medical Center · ILUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is of utmost importance for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). Evidence of intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis proves the inflammatory nature of the disease, increases diagnostic certainty and substitutes for dissemination in time according to current diagnostic criteria. The gold standard to determine intrathecal IgG synthesis is the detection of CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCBs). However, advances in laboratory methods brought up κ-free light chains (FLCs) as a new biomarker, which are produced in excess over intact immunoglobulins and accumulate in CSF in the case of central nervous system-derived inflammation. Overwhelming evidence showed a high diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal κ-FLC synthesis in MS with sensitivity and specificity of approximately 90% similar to OCB. κ-FLCs have advantages as its detection is fast, easy, cost-effective, reliable, rater-independent and returning quantitative results which might also improve the value of predicting MS disease activity. An international panel of experts in MS and CSF diagnostics developed a consensus of all participants. Six recommendations are given for establishing standard CSF evaluation in patients suspected of having MS. The panel recommended to include intrathecal κ-FLC synthesis in the next revision of MS diagnostic criteria as an additional tool to measure intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisBiomarkersHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsOligoclonal BandsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsOligoclonal BandsbiomarkerCerebrospinal fluidclinically isolated syndromeconsensusdiagnosisdisease activityindexkappa-free light chainsmultiple sclerosisprediction

Identifiers

PMID36527368
PMCPMC9925908
OpenAlexW4311823775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.