ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2023
The effects of topical anesthesia on outcomes and glucose control in diabetic patients treated with split-thickness skin graft surgery.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUsing split-thickness skin grafting to treat diabetic foot and leg ulcers is common. Diabetic patients usually exhibit multiple comorbidities and high risks of adverse responses to general and spinal anesthesia. Topical anesthesia can be an alternative to avoid these risks. In this study, the clinical experience of split-thickness skin grafting under topical anesthesia was demonstrated, to evaluate its effectiveness and benefits in diabetic patients.
methodsFrom 2018 to 2020, diabetic patients with foot or leg wounds undergoing split-thickness skin grafting were reviewed and categorized into two groups according to the anesthesia methods: topical anesthesia and general/spinal anesthesia. Patient demographics, wound characteristics and healing status, postoperative complications, and perioperative blood glucose levels were recorded and analyzed.
resultsDuring the study period, 28 patients underwent split-thickness skin grafting under topical anesthesia and 46 under general/spinal anesthesia. The rate of complete wound healing in 4 weeks was similar in both the groups. The topical anesthesia group suffered fewer postoperative infections (3.6% vs 21.7%, p = 0.044), required shorter postoperative hospitalization (8.3 ± 6.2 vs 11.1 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.048), and exhibited lower mean blood glucose levels and less glucose variability than the general/spinal anesthesia group.
conclusionConducting split-thickness skin grafting under topical anesthesia was shown to be a safe and effective means of treating leg and foot wounds in diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.