Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527167›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2022

Low disease activity of microscopic polyangiitis in patients with anti-myosin light chain 6 antibody that disrupts actin rearrangement necessary for neutrophil extracellular trap formation.

Miku Yoshinari, Yuka Nishibata, Sakiko Masuda, Daigo Nakazawa, Utano Tomaru, Yoshihiro Arimura, Koichi Amano, Yukio Yuzawa, Ken-Ei Sada, Tatsuya Atsumi and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Disulfidptosis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Miku YoshinariDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yuka NishibataDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Sakiko MasudaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Daigo NakazawaDepartment of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Utano TomaruDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshihiro ArimuraDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi AmanoDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yukio YuzawaDepartment of Nephrology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Ken-Ei SadaDepartment of Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Tatsuya AtsumiDepartment of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroaki DobashiDivision of Hematology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Hitoshi HasegawaDepartment of Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Masayoshi HarigaiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichi MatsuoTokai National Higher Education and Research System (THERS), Nagoya, Japan.
Hirofumi MakinoOkayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Akihiro IshizuDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. aishizu@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Hokkaido University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPOkayama University · JPEhime University · JPFujita Health University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPKagawa University · JPKyorin University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPTokai National Higher Education and Research SystemTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are critically involved in microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) pathogenesis, and some patients with MPA possess anti-NET antibody (ANETA). Anti-myosin light chain 6 (MYL6) antibody is an ANETA that affects NETs. This study aimed to determine the significance of anti-MYL6 antibody in MPA.

methodsThe influence of anti-MYL6 antibody on NET formation and actin rearrangement necessary for NET formation was assessed by fluorescent staining. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was established to detect serum anti-MYL6 antibody, and the prevalence of this antibody in MPA was determined. Furthermore, the disease activity and response to remission-induction therapy of MPA were compared between anti-MYL6 antibody-positive and anti-MYL6 antibody-negative MPA patients.

resultsAnti-MYL6 antibody disrupted G-actin polymerization into F-actin, suppressing phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced NET formation. Serum anti-MYL6 antibody was detected in 7 of 59 patients with MPA. The Birmingham vasculitis activity score (BVAS) of anti-MYL6 antibody-positive MPA patients was significantly lower than anti-MYL6 antibody-negative MPA patients. Among the nine BVAS evaluation items, the cutaneous, cardiovascular, and nervous system scores of anti-MYL6 antibody-positive MPA patients were significantly lower than anti-MYL6 antibody-negative MPA patients, although other items, including the renal and chest scores, were equivalent between the two groups. The proportion of patients with remission 6 months after initiation of remission-induction therapy in anti-MYL6 antibody-positive MPA patients was significantly higher than in anti-MYL6 antibody-negative MPA patients.

conclusionsCollective findings suggested that anti-MYL6 antibody disrupted actin rearrangement necessary for NET formation and could reduce the disease activity of MPA.

Indexed as

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisExtracellular TrapsMicroscopic PolyangiitisActinsAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicHumansKidneyActinsAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicANETAAnti-MYL6 antibodyMPANETs

Identifiers

PMID36527167
PMCPMC9756472
OpenAlexW4312066229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.