Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527142›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

The Social Safeness and Pleasure Scale (SSPS): a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version in a non-clinical sample and two clinical samples with eating disorders or borderline personality disorder.

Martina Isaksson, Maria Holmbom Goh, Mia Ramklint, Martina Wolf-Arehult

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06549777 (Body-oriented Psychotherapy vs. Psychoeducation and Treatment Information for Individuals With a History of Child Maltreatment and Trauma-related Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06549777 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Body-oriented Psychotherapy vs. Psychoeducation and Treatment Information for Individuals With a History of Child Maltreatment and Trauma-related Symptoms: Assessing Safety, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonique PfaltzRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsSafety, Psychological, Acceptability of Health Care, Psychological Safety, Maltreatment, ChildArmsSE-group, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martina IsakssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. martina.isaksson@neuro.uu.se.
Maria Holmbom GohDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mia RamklintDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Martina Wolf-ArehultDepartment of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial safeness and pleasure refer to the extent to which people experience their world as safe, warm, and soothing. Difficulties in achieving social safeness have been identified as a transdiagnostic vulnerability factor for developing and maintaining psychopathology and for feeling less contentment and self-compassion. The study aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Social Safeness and Pleasure Scale (SSPS).

methodsThe SSPS was evaluated in a non-clinical sample of 407 participants. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SSPS were explored and a confirmatory factor analysis was performed. Convergent validity was studied based on the assumption of negative correlations with the personality traits detachment and mistrust, derived from the Swedish Universities Scale of Personality. Divergent validity was studied based on the assumption of no or small correlations with impulsiveness and adventure-seeking-personality traits not assumed to be related to social safeness. Validity was also investigated by comparing the SSPS results in the non-clinical sample with those in two clinical groups of patients diagnosed with either borderline personality disorder (BPD; n = 58) or eating disorders (n = 103), recruited from two psychiatric outpatient clinics.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis confirmed a one-factor structure. Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 and test-retest reliability was 0.92. Validity was supported by moderate to strong negative correlations between the SSPS and the detachment and mistrust scales and no or small correlations with the impulsiveness and adventure-seeking scales in a personality questionnaire. Finally, we found significantly lower mean values on the SSPS in the clinical groups compared with the non-clinical group, with the lowest mean in the BPD sample.

conclusionsThe results showed good to excellent psychometric properties for the Swedish version of the SSPS, supporting its use in both clinical practice and research. Future research could use the SSPS when evaluating interventions aimed at improving the ability to develop social safeness, such as compassion-focused therapy or radically open dialectical behavior therapy, interventions that may be particularly important in BPD patients.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansPleasurePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenBorderline personality disorderEating disordersFactor structurePsychometric propertiesReliabilitySocial Safeness and Pleasure ScaleValidity

Identifiers

PMID36527142
PMCPMC9756562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.