Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527075›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Effects of different doses of vancomycin powder in total knee and hip arthroplasty on the periprosthetic joint infection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shiyu Liao, Zhize Yang, Xiao Li, Jintian Chen, Jian-Guo Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiyu LiaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, 130000, Jilin, China.
Zhize YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, 130000, Jilin, China.
Xiao LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, 130000, Jilin, China.
Jintian ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, 130000, Jilin, China.
Jian-Guo LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, 130000, Jilin, China. liujg6@126.com.
First Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a serious complication for patients. Some joint surgeons have tried to use vancomycin powder (VP) in total knee and total hip arthroplasty to prevent postoperative PJI, but its effect is still not clear. At present, there is no meta-analysis that specifically analyses the effect of different doses of vancomycin powder on the incidence of PJI.

methodsWe carried out a search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and identified the studies we needed. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was employed for statistical analysis.

resultsThe analysis of primary TKA (PTKA) showed that using 1 g (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.67 [P = 0.0008]) and 2 g (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74 [P = 0.0008]) of vancomycin powder in primary TKA (PTKA) could all significantly prevent PJI. The analysis of primary THA (PTHA) showed that using 1 g (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80 [P = 0.01]) of vancomycin powder effectively decreased the incidence of PJI, while using 2 g (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53-1.97 [P = 0.94]) of vancomycin powder had no significant effect on preventing PJI. Because the data were abnormal, we believed the conclusion that using 2 g of vancomycin powder in primary THA had no effect on preventing PJI was doubtful. Using vancomycin powder in revision TKA (RTKA) significantly reduced the PJI rate (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77 [P = 0.01]), similar to revision THA (RTHA) (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.96 [P = 0.04]).

conclusionsIn primary TKA, both 1 g and 2 g of vancomycin powder can effectively prevent PJI. In primary THA, using 1 g of vancomycin powder is a better choice, while the effect of using 2 g of vancomycin powder is not clear, and a more prospective randomized controlled trial should be done to verify it. In revision TKA and revision THA, vancomycin powder is a good choice to prevent PJI.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsHumansPowdersProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesVancomycinPowdersVancomycinPeriprosthetic joint infectionTHATJATKAVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID36527075
PMCPMC9758814
OpenAlexW4312067118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.