Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527057›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Assessment of community pharmacy professionals' willingness, involvement, beliefs, and barriers to offer health promotion services: a cross-sectional study.

Wondim Ayenew, Abdulwase Mohammed Seid, Asmamaw Emagn Kasahun, Asrat Elias Ergena, Derso Teju Geremaw, Liknaw Workie Limenh, Teshome Bitew Demelash, Wudneh Simegn, Yeniewa Kerie Anagaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Community pharmacists' role in prevention of breast cancer - is it possible?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wondim AyenewDepartment of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. yimesgen20@gmail.com.
Abdulwase Mohammed SeidDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Asmamaw Emagn KasahunDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Asrat Elias ErgenaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Derso Teju GeremawDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Liknaw Workie LimenhDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Teshome Bitew DemelashDepartment of Pharmacy, Pawi Health Science College, Pawi, Ethiopia.
Wudneh SimegnDepartment of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Yeniewa Kerie AnagawDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe role of community pharmacy professionals has been expanded to patient care and health promotion service globally. However, in Ethiopia, there is a scanty of data on the issue, although the country is dealing with a double burden of non-communicable and communicable diseases.

objectivesThis study aimed to assess community pharmacy professionals' willingness, involvement, beliefs, and barriers to offer extended services for health promotion in Injibara town, Amhara, Ethiopia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among licensed and registered community pharmacy professionals working in Injibara town from June 25 to July 10, 2022. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. The data were presented using descriptive statistics. The data were analyzed using STATA version 16 software.

resultsA total of 24 community pharmacy professionals were involved in the study, with a response rate of 92.3%. Approximately 91.7% of them were involved in health promotional services. Of them, 54.1% were willing and strongly believed that their involvement in health promotion services would have a positive impact on promoting health. A total of 60.9% of the community pharmacy professionals reported that they were very involved in family planning and alcohol consumption counseling. Different barriers to not providing health promotion services were also cited.

conclusionsMajority of community pharmacy professionals in this study is involved in health promotional services but there are also barriers on their involvement. Therefore, governmental strategies to overcome the barriers that hamper their involvement should be designed.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmaciesCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHealth PromotionHumansPharmacistsSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity pharmacyCommunity pharmacy professionalsHealth promotionInjibara

Identifiers

PMID36527057
PMCPMC9758862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.