Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36527022›Full record

ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2022

Treatment persistence in patients with schizophrenia treated with lurasidone in Italian clinical practice.

Andrea Fagiolini, Miriam Olivola, Lisa Lavatelli, Antonello Bellomo, Caterina Lobaccaro, Nathalie Falsetto, Marco Micillo, Alessandro Cuomo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea FagioliniUniversità Di Siena, V.Le Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena (SI), Italy. andreafagiolini@gmail.com.
Miriam OlivolaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia and Servizio Psichiatrico Di Diagnosi E Cura ASST Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Repubblica 34, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Lisa LavatelliPsichiatria 1 ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, MI, Italy.
Antonello BellomoUniversity of Foggia, Viale Luigi Pinto, 1, 71122, Foggia, MI, Italy.
Caterina LobaccaroCentro Salute Mentale Area 2 DSM ASL, Bari, Italy.
Nathalie FalsettoAngelini Pharma S.P.A, Viale Amelia70, 00181, Rome, Italy.
Marco MicilloAngelini Pharma S.P.A, Viale Amelia70, 00181, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro CuomoUniversity of Siena, V.Le Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, SI, Italy.
Angelini Pharma (Italy) · ITUniversity of Siena · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and rationaleTreatment persistence combines clinician and patient judgment of efficacy, tolerability and safety into a comprehensive measure of effectiveness and is defined as the act of continuing a treatment over time. Studies have reported poor treatment persistence to antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluated treatment persistence to lurasidone (LUR) in patients with schizophrenia in a real-world Italian setting.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study of patients with schizophrenia who started treatment with LUR ≥ 6 months before inclusion. Following informed consent, data were collected starting from the index date (start of LUR treatment) at all visits occurring as per clinical practice. The primary endpoint was treatment persistence during the first 6 months, defined as the time between index date and all-cause discontinuation. Patients treated with LUR > 180 days were considered persistent. As secondary endpoint, treatment persistence was evaluated for a period of  ≥ 18 months.

resultsForty-five patients were enrolled and 41 (91.11%) completed the study. Forty-one patients (91.11%) were included in the eligible population as they initiated LUR treatment  ≥ 6 months before data collection. Patients were 43.0 ± 15.89 years old and 61% were female. Twenty-two patients (53.66%) started LUR treatment in a hospital setting and 19 (46.34%) in an outpatient setting. Based on Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) at LUR initiation, 12 patients (29.27%) were severely ill, 17.07% markedly ill, 19.51% moderately ill, 2.44% mildly ill and 4.88% borderline mentally ill. Thirty-two patients (78.05%) were treatment persistent for  ≥ 180 days. Among the 19 patients observed for  ≥ 18 months, 11 (57.89%) were persistent for  ≥ 18 months. Among the 22 study patients observed for  < 18 months, 12 (54.54%) were persistent. An improvement in schizophrenia severity according to CGI-S was observed at inclusion (following LUR therapy) compared to the index date. Six patients (14.63%) experienced at least one adverse drug reaction: akathisia (7.32%), extrapyramidal disorder (4.88%), hyperprolactinemia (2.44%), restlessness (2.44%), and galactorrhea (2.44%). None were serious.

conclusionsPersistence to LUR in patients with schizophrenia was relatively high: 78% and 58% of patients were still on LUR after 6 and 18 months of treatment, respectively. This may reflect LUR's relatively favorable balance between efficacy and tolerability, as well as favorable patient satisfaction and acceptance.

Indexed as

LurasidoneSchizophreniaTreatment persistence

Identifiers

PMID36527022
PMCPMC9756598
OpenAlexW4312067422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.