Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526998›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

Examining the impact perceptual learning artificial-intelligence-based on the incidence of paresthesia when performing the ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block: simulation-based randomized study.

Nan Cai, Geng Wang, Li Xu, Yan Zhou, Hao Chong, Yaoping Zhao, Jingxian Wang, Wenjia Yan, Bo Zhang, Nan Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nan CaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Geng WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China. 18600025087@163.com.
Li XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Hao ChongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Yaoping ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Jingxian WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Wenjia YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Bo ZhangBeijing AMIT Healthcare, Beijing, 100000, China.
Nan LiuBeijing AMIT Healthcare, Beijing, 100000, China.
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the impact of artificial-intelligence perceptual learning when performing the ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block.

methodsThis simulation-based randomized study enrolled residents who underwent ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block training at the Department of Anesthesiology of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between January 2022 and February 2022. Residents were randomly divided into a traditional teaching group and an AI teaching group. All residents attended the same nerve block theory courses, while those in the AI teaching group participated in training course using an AI-assisted nerve identification system based on a convolutional neural network instead of traditional training.

resultsA total of 40 residents were included. The complication rates of paresthesia during puncture in the first month of clinical sciatic nerve block practice after training were significantly lower in the AI teaching group than in the traditional teaching group [11 (4.12%) vs. 36 (14.06%), P = 0.000093]. The rates of paresthesia/pain during injection were significantly lower in the AI teaching group than in the traditional teaching group [6 (2.25%) vs. 17 (6.64%), P = 0.025]. The Assessment Checklist for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia (32 ± 3.8 vs. 29.4 ± 3.9, P = 0.001) and nerve block self-rating scores (7.53 ± 1.62 vs. 6.49 ± 1.85, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the AI teaching group than in the traditional teaching group. There were no significant differences in the remaining indicators.

conclusionThe inclusion of an AI-assisted nerve identification system based on convolutional neural network as part of the training program for ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block via the popliteal approach may reduce the incidence of nerve paresthesia and this might be related to improved perceptual learning. CLINICAL TRIAL: CHiCTR2200055115 , registered on 1/ January /2022.

Indexed as

Sciatic NerveUltrasonography, InterventionalArtificial IntelligenceHumansIncidenceIntelligenceParesthesiaArtificial intelligenceNerve blockPerceptual learningSciatic nerve block via the popliteal approachSimulation-based randomized studyTeachingUltrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID36526998
PMCPMC9756465
OpenAlexW4312065456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.