Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526995›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Emotional dysregulation in women with endometriosis with cyclical and non-cyclical chronic pelvic pain.

Dulce Carolina Rodríguez-Lozano, María Del Pilar Meza-Rodríguez, Olivier Paul Cruz-Orozco, Brenda Sánchez-Ramírez, Andrea Olguin-Ortega, José Roberto Silvestri-Tomassoni, Guillermo Corona-Barsse, Luis Fernando Escobar-Ponce, Juan Mario Solis-Paredes, Benjamín Dominguez-Trejo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Women's Causal Beliefs About Their Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dulce Carolina Rodríguez-LozanoUnidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología-Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, (CD MX), Mexico.
María Del Pilar Meza-RodríguezDepartamento de Neurociencias, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Av. Montes Urales # 800. Col. Lomas de Virreyes, 11000, Mexico City, CD MX, Mexico. mezapilar@yahoo.com.
Olivier Paul Cruz-OrozcoDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Brenda Sánchez-RamírezDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Andrea Olguin-OrtegaDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
José Roberto Silvestri-TomassoniDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Guillermo Corona-BarsseDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Luis Fernando Escobar-PonceDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Mario Solis-ParedesDepartamento de Genética y Genómica Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Benjamín Dominguez-TrejoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ignacio Camacho-ArroyoUnidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología-Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, (CD MX), Mexico. camachoarroyo@gmail.com.
Instituto Nacional de Perinatología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 74974Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico 2019–1-51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a pathophysiological condition characterized by glands and stroma outside the uterus in regions such as the bladder, ureter, fallopian tubes, peritoneum, ovaries, and even in extra pelvic sites. One of the main clinical problems of endometriosis is chronic pelvic pain (CPP), which considerably affects the patients' quality of life. Patients with endometriosis may, cyclically or non-cyclically (80% of cases) experience CPP. High levels of anxiety and depression have been described in patients with endometriosis related to CPP; however, this has not been evaluated in endometriosis women with different types of CPP. Therefore, the research question of this study was whether there is a difference in the emotional dysregulation due to the type of pain experienced by women with endometriosis?

methodsThis work was performed in the National Institute of Perinatology (INPer) in Mexico City from January 2019 to March 2020 and aimed to determine if there are differences in emotional dysregulation in patients with cyclical and non-cyclical CPP. 49 women from 18 to 52 years-old diagnosed with endometriosis presenting cyclical and non-cyclical CPP answered several batteries made up of Mini-Mental State Examination, Visual Analog Scale, Beck's Depression Inventory, State Trait-Anxiety Inventory, and Generalized Anxiety Inventory. Mann-Whitney U and Student's t-test for independent samples to compare the difference between groups was used. Relative risk estimation was performed to determine the association between non-cyclical and cyclical CPP with probability of presenting emotional dysregulation.

resultsWe observed that patients with non-cyclical CPP exhibited higher levels of depression and anxiety (trait-state and generalized anxiety) than patients with cyclical pain, p < 0.05 was considered significant. No differences were observed in pain intensity, but there was a higher probability of developing emotional dysregulation (anxiety or depression) in patients with non-cyclical CPP. No differences were observed in cognitive impairment.

conclusionsOur data suggest that patients with non-cyclical (persistent) CPP present a higher emotional dysregulation than those with cyclical pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEndometriosisAdolescentAdultAnxietyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic PainQuality of LifeYoung AdultAnxietyChronic pelvic painDepressionEmotionsEndometriosisMenstrual cycle

Identifiers

PMID36526995
PMCPMC9758838
OpenAlexW4312066805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.