Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526885›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Power analysis for idiographic (within-subject) clinical trials: Implications for treatments of rare conditions and precision medicine.

Stephen Tueller, Derek Ramirez, Jessica D Cance, Ai Ye, Anne C Wheeler, Zheng Fan, Christoph Hornik, Ty A Ridenour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen TuellerRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, 326 Cox Bldg, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Derek RamirezRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, 326 Cox Bldg, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Jessica D CanceRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, 326 Cox Bldg, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Ai YeUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Anne C WheelerRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, 326 Cox Bldg, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Zheng FanUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Christoph HornikDuke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Ty A RidenourRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, 326 Cox Bldg, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA. tridenour@rti.org.

Funding

ICT Tools for Rare DiseasesR21TR002402 · NCATS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI RIDENOUR, TY A · 2019 to 2020
$435k
NCATS NIH HHS R21 TR002402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Power analysis informs a priori planning of behavioral and medical research, including for randomized clinical trials that are nomothetic (i.e., studies designed to infer results to the general population based on interindividual variabilities). Far fewer investigations and resources are available for power analysis of clinical trials that follow an idiographic approach, which emphasizes intraindividual variabilities between baseline (control) phase versus one or more treatment phases. We tested the impact on statistical power to detect treatment outcomes of four idiographic trial design factors that are under researchers' control, assuming a multiple baseline design: sample size, number of observations per participant, proportion of observations in the baseline phase, and competing statistical models (i.e., hierarchical modeling versus piecewise regression). We also tested the impact of four factors that are largely outside of researchers' control: population size, proportion of intraindividual variability due to residual error, treatment effect size, and form of outcomes during the treatment phase (phase jump versus gradual change). Monte Carlo simulations using all combinations of the factors were sampled with replacement from finite populations of 200, 1750, and 3500 participants. Analyses characterized the unique relative impact of each factor individually and all two-factor combinations, holding all others constant. Each factor impacted power, with the greatest impact being from larger treatment effect sizes, followed respectively by more observations per participant, larger samples, less residual variance, and the unexpected improvement in power associated with assigning closer to 50% of observations to the baseline phase. This study's techniques and R package better enable a priori rigorous design of idiographic clinical trials for rare diseases, precision medicine, and other small-sample studies.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineRare DiseasesHumansModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodSample SizeEffect sizeHierarchical modelingIdiographicMonte Carlo simulationPiecewise regressionPrecision medicineRare diseasesStatistical powerWithin-subject clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID36526885
PMCPMC9757638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.