Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526827›Full record

SynthesisJournal of endocrinological investigation2023

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and cancer: new perspectives on an old relationship.

R Modica, E Benevento, A Colao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Thermodynamic and Structural Insights into Endocrine Disruptor Adsorption.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multi omics network toxicology andFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Testicular Neoplasms and Other Abnormalities in Common CarpAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  20. A comparative study ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Modica *Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit of Federico, II University of Naples, Via Pansini N.5, 80131, Naples, Italy. robertamodica@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3768-5803
E Benevento *Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit of Federico, II University of Naples, Via Pansini N.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
A ColaoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit of Federico, II University of Naples, Via Pansini N.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnvironmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are a mixture of chemical compounds capable to interfere with endocrine axis at different levels and to which population is daily exposed. This paper aims to review the relationship between EDCs and breast, prostate, testicle, ovary, and thyroid cancer, discussing carcinogenic activity of known EDCs, while evaluating the impact on public health.

methodsA literature review regarding EDCs and cancer was carried out with particular interest on meta-analysis and human studies.

resultsThe definition of EDCs has been changed through years, and currently there are no common criteria to test new chemicals to clarify their possible carcinogenic activity. Moreover, it is difficult to assess the full impact of human exposure to EDCs because adverse effects develop latently and manifest at different ages, even if preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that developing fetus and neonates are most vulnerable to endocrine disruption.

conclusionEDCs represent a major environmental and health issue that has a role in cancer development. There are currently some EDCs that can be considered as carcinogenic, like dioxin and cadmium for breast and thyroid cancer; arsenic, asbestos, and dioxin for prostate cancer; and organochlorines/organohalogens for testicular cancer. New evidence supports the role of other EDCs as possible carcinogenic and pregnant women should avoid risk area and exposure. The relationship between EDCs and cancer supports the need for effective prevention policies increasing public awareness.

Indexed as

DioxinsEndocrine DisruptorsTesticular NeoplasmsThyroid NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisEndocrine SystemFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyDioxinsEndocrine DisruptorsBreastCancerEndocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs)OvaryProstateTesticleThyroid

Identifiers

PMID36526827
OpenAlexW4311826255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.