Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526804›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2023

Mental health in clinically referred children and young people before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Kapil Sayal, Christopher Partlett, Anupam Bhardwaj, Bernadka Dubicka, Tamsin Marshall, Julia Gledhill, Colleen Ewart, Marilyn James, Alexandra Lang, Kirsty Sprange and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kapil SayalSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. kapil.sayal@nottingham.ac.uk.
Christopher PartlettSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Anupam BhardwajCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Bernadka DubickaUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tamsin MarshallBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.
Julia GledhillCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Colleen EwartSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Marilyn JamesSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Alexandra LangFaculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kirsty SprangeSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Alan MontgomerySchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic and mitigation approaches, including lockdowns and school closures, are thought to have negatively impacted children and young people's (CYP) mental health. However, the impact for clinically referred CYP is less clear. We investigated differences in the mental health of CYP referred to specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) before and since the onset of the pandemic. Using baseline data (self- and parent- completed Mood and Feelings Questionnaire and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) from an ongoing RCT (STADIA; ISRCTN: 15748675) in England involving 5-17-year-olds with emotional difficulties recently referred to CAMHS (non-urgent referrals), with repeated cross-sectional comparisons of CYP (n = 1028) recruited during 5 different time  periods: (1) Before schools were closed (Group 1 (pre-pandemic); n = 308; 27.08.2019-20.03.2020). (2) Early pandemic period until schools fully re-opened, which included the first national lockdown, its easing and the summer holidays (Group 2 (in-pandemic); n = 183; 21.03.2020-31.08.2020). (3) The following school-term-schools fully re-opened and remained open, including during the second national lockdown (Group 3 (in-pandemic); n = 204; 01.09.2020-18.12.2020). (4) Schools closed as part of the third national lockdown (Group 4 (in-pandemic); n = 101; 05.01.2021-07.03.2021). (5) Schools re-opened and remained open, until the school summer holidays (Group 5 (in-pandemic); n = 232; 08.03.2021-16.07.2021). Most CYP scored above cutoff for emotional problems and depression, with three-quarters meeting criteria for a probable disorder ('caseness'). The groups did not differ on parent-rated mental health measures. However, self-rated emotional problems, depression, functional impairment and caseness appeared to be higher amongst participants recruited in the two periods following school re-openings. In particular, functional impairment and caseness were greater in Group 5 compared with Group 2. Although symptom severity or impairment did not change in the initial pandemic period, self-reported difficulties were greater during the periods after schools re-opened. This suggests possible greater stresses in the adjustment to re-starting school following recurrent lockdowns and school closures.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentChildCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMental HealthPandemicsChildren and young peopleCovid-19LockdownMental healthSchool closuresSchool re-openingsSTADIA

Identifiers

PMID36526804
PMCPMC9758019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.