Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526728›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Efficacy of bone stimulators in large-animal models and humans may be limited by weak electric fields reaching fracture.

Nishant Verma, Todd Le, Jonah Mudge, Peter J Nicksic, Lillian Xistris, Maisha Kasole, Andrew J Shoffstall, Samuel O Poore, Kip A Ludwig, Aaron M Dingle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Accelerated Bone Healing via Electrical Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nishant VermaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Todd LeDivision of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jonah MudgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Peter J NicksicDivision of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Lillian XistrisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Maisha KasoleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Andrew J ShoffstallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Samuel O PooreDivision of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Kip A Ludwig *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. kip.ludwig@wisc.edu.
Aaron M Dingle *Division of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWisconsin Institutes for Discovery · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive electronic bone growth stimulators (EBGSs) have been in clinical use for decades. However, systematic reviews show inconsistent and limited clinical efficacy. Further, noninvasive EBGS studies in small animals, where the stimulation electrode is closer to the fracture site, have shown promising efficacy, which has not translated to large animals or humans. We propose that this is due to the weaker electric fields reaching the fracture site when scaling from small animals to large animals and humans. To address this gap, we measured the electric field strength reaching the bone during noninvasive EBGS therapy in human and sheep cadaver legs and in finite element method (FEM) models of human and sheep legs. During application of 1100 V/m with an external EBGS, only 21 V/m reached the fracture site in humans. Substantially weaker electric fields reached the fracture site during the later stages of healing and at increased bone depths. To augment the electric field strength reaching the fracture site during noninvasive EBGS therapy, we introduced the Injectrode, an injectable electrode that spans the distance between the bone and subcutaneous tissue. Our study lays the groundwork to improve the efficacy of noninvasive EBGSs by increasing the electric field strength reaching the fracture site.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFractures, BoneAnimalsBone and BonesHumansModels, AnimalOsteogenesisSheep

Identifiers

PMID36526728
PMCPMC9758190
OpenAlexW4312065737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.