ArticleScientific reports2022
Detection of factors affecting kidney function using machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Models for Identifying the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Empowering an Acute Kidney Injury 3D Graphene-Based Sensor Using Extreme Learning Machine.ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the increasing prevalence of chronic kidney disease and its high mortality rate, study of risk factors affecting the progression of the disease is of great importance. Here in this work, we aim to develop a framework for using machine learning methods to identify factors affecting kidney function. To this end classification methods are trained to predict the serum creatinine level based on numerical values of other blood test parameters in one of the three classes representing different ranges of the variable values. Models are trained using the data from blood test results of healthy and patient subjects including 46 different blood test parameters. The best developed models are random forest and LightGBM. Interpretation of the resulting model reveals a direct relationship between vitamin D and blood creatinine level. The detected analogy between these two parameters is reliable, regarding the relatively high predictive accuracy of the random forest model reaching the AUC of 0.90 and the accuracy of 0.74. Moreover, in this paper we develop a Bayesian network to infer the direct relationships between blood test parameters which have consistent results with the classification models. The proposed framework uses an inclusive set of advanced imputation methods to deal with the main challenge of working with electronic health data, missing values. Hence it can be applied to similar clinical studies to investigate and discover the relationships between the factors under study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.