Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Distractor-induced saccade trajectory curvature reveals visual contralateral bias with respect to the dominant eye.

Romain Chaumillon, Nadia Alahyane, Patrice Senot, Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois, Karine Doré-Mazars, Dorine Vergilino-Perez, Alain Guillaume

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Romain ChaumillonLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Nadia AlahyaneLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Patrice SenotLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Christelle Lemoine-LardennoisLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Karine Doré-MazarsLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Dorine Vergilino-PerezLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Alain GuillaumeLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition, Université Paris Cité, EA 7326, Boulogne Billancourt, France. alain.guillaume@u-paris.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-8459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The functional consequences of the visual system lateralization referred to as "eye dominance" remain poorly understood. We previously reported shorter hand reaction times for targets appearing in the contralateral visual hemifield with respect to the dominant eye (DE). Here, we further explore this contralateral bias by studying the influence of laterally placed visual distractors on vertical saccade trajectories, a sensitive method to assess visual processing. In binocular conditions, saccade trajectory curvature was larger toward a distractor placed in the contralateral hemifield with respect to the DE (e.g., in the left visual hemifield for a participant with a right dominant eye) than toward one presented in the ipsilateral hemifield (in the right visual hemifield in our example). When two distractors were present at the same time, the vertical saccade showed curvature toward the contralateral side. In monocular conditions, when one distractor was presented, a similar larger influence of the contralateral distractor was observed only when the viewing eye was the DE. When the non dominant eye (NDE) was viewing, curvature was symmetric for both distractor sides. Interestingly, this curvature was as large as the one obtained for the contralateral distractor when the DE was viewing, suggesting that eye dominance consequences rely on inhibition mechanisms present when the DE is viewing. Overall, these results demonstrate that DE influences visual integration occurring around saccade production and support a DE-based contralateral visual bias.

Indexed as

SaccadesVisual PerceptionDominance, OcularHumansPhotic StimulationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID36526694
PMCPMC9758137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.