Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526653›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Preparatory attention to visual features primarily relies on non-sensory representation.

Mengyuan Gong, Yilin Chen, Taosheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Preparatory Attention to Visual Features Spreads Globally.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hierarchical Organization of Human Visual Feature Attention Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengyuan GongDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China. gongmy426@zju.edu.cn.
Yilin ChenDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310028, People's Republic of China.
Taosheng LiuDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, USA. tsliu@msu.edu.

Funding

Representation of attentional priority for visual features in the human brainR01EY032071 · NEI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, TAOSHENG · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior knowledge of behaviorally relevant information promotes preparatory attention before the appearance of stimuli. A key question is how our brain represents the attended information during preparation. A sensory template hypothesis assumes that preparatory signals evoke neural activity patterns that resembled the perception of the attended stimuli, whereas a non-sensory, abstract template hypothesis assumes that preparatory signals reflect the abstraction of attended stimuli. To test these hypotheses, we used fMRI and multivariate analysis to characterize neural activity patterns when human participants were prepared to attend a feature and then select it from a compound stimulus. In an fMRI experiment using basic visual feature (motion direction), we observed reliable decoding of the to-be-attended feature from the preparatory activity in both visual and frontoparietal areas. However, while the neural patterns constructed by a single feature from a baseline task generalized to the activity patterns during stimulus selection, they could not generalize to the activity patterns during preparation. Our findings thus suggest that neural signals during attentional preparation are predominantly non-sensory in nature that may reflect an abstraction of the attended feature. Such a representation could provide efficient and stable guidance of attention.

Indexed as

Brain MappingFrontal LobeBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID36526653
PMCPMC9758135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.