ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2022
Muscle stem cells and fibro-adipogenic progenitors in female pelvic floor muscle regeneration following birth injury.
Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Effect of lactation on postpartum pelvic floor muscle regeneration in preclinical model.npj women's health · 2025Article
- Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on pelvic floor muscle regeneration in a preclinical birth injury rat model.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Possible Mechanisms Linking Obesity, Steroidogenesis, and Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) injury during childbirth is a key risk factor for pelvic floor disorders that affect millions of women worldwide. Muscle stem cells (MuSCs), supported by the fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs) and immune cells, are indispensable for the regeneration of injured appendicular skeletal muscles. However, almost nothing is known about their role in PFM regeneration following birth injury. To elucidate the role of MuSCs, FAPs, and immune infiltrate in this context, we used radiation to perturb cell function and followed PFM recovery in a validated simulated birth injury (SBI) rat model. Non-irradiated and irradiated rats were euthanized at 3,7,10, and 28 days post-SBI (dpi). Twenty-eight dpi, PFM fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) was significantly lower and the extracellular space occupied by immune infiltrate was larger in irradiated relative to nonirradiated injured animals. Following SBI in non-irradiated animals, MuSCs and FAPs expanded significantly at 7 and 3 dpi, respectively; this expansion did not occur in irradiated animals at the same time points. At 7 and 10 dpi, we observed persistent immune response in PFMs subjected to irradiation compared to non-irradiated injured PFMs. CSA of newly regenerated fibers was also significantly smaller following SBI in irradiated compared to non-irradiated injured PFMs. Our results demonstrate that the loss of function and decreased expansion of MuSCs and FAPs after birth injury lead to impaired PFM recovery. These findings form the basis for further studies focused on the identification of novel therapeutic targets to counteract postpartum PFM dysfunction and the associated pelvic floor disorders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.