Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526530›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology

Evolution of the insect Hox gene cluster: Comparative analysis across 243 species.

Peter O Mulhair, Peter W H Holland

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unbiased anchors for reliable genome-wide synteny detection.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. eLife · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hox genes: The original body builders.Seminars in cell & developmental biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter O MulhairDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK. Electronic address: peter.mulhair@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Peter W H HollandDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK. Electronic address: peter.holland@biology.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hox gene cluster is an iconic example of evolutionary conservation between divergent animal lineages, providing evidence for ancient similarities in the genetic control of embryonic development. However, there are differences between taxa in gene order, gene number and genomic organisation implying conservation is not absolute. There are also examples of radical functional change of Hox genes; for example, the ftz, zen and bcd genes in insects play roles in segmentation, extraembryonic membrane formation and body polarity, rather than specification of anteroposterior position. There have been detailed descriptions of Hox genes and Hox gene clusters in several insect species, including important model systems, but a large-scale overview has been lacking. Here we extend these studies using the publicly-available complete genome sequences of 243 insect species from 13 orders. We show that the insect Hox cluster is characterised by large intergenic distances, consistently extreme in Odonata, Orthoptera, Hemiptera and Trichoptera, and always larger between the 'posterior' Hox genes. We find duplications of ftz and zen in many species and multiple independent cluster breaks, although certain modules of neighbouring genes are rarely broken apart suggesting some organisational constraints. As more high-quality genomes are obtained, a challenge will be to relate structural genomic changes to phenotypic change across insect phylogeny.

Indexed as

Gene clusterHexapodaHomeoboxShx

Identifiers

PMID36526530
PMCPMC10914929
OpenAlexW4311491238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.