Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526317›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Machine-learning approaches to identify determining factors of happiness during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study.

Itsuki Osawa, Tadahiro Goto, Takahiro Tabuchi, Hayami K Koga, Yusuke Tsugawa

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Profiles of subjective well-being among people living with HIV during the COVID-19 pandemic.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Itsuki OsawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan ioosawa-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7790-9130
Tadahiro GotoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5880-2968
Takahiro TabuchiCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-3125
Hayami K KogaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9716-2502
Yusuke TsugawaDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Service Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-4833
Harvard University · USOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

The Impact of Surgeon Factors and Education/Training on Disparities in Surgical Care.R01MD013913 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TSUGAWA, YUSUKE · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
The Impact of physician and health system factors on the quality of care for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias at the end of lifeR01AG068633 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TSUGAWA, YUSUKE · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068633NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate determining factors of happiness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designObservational study.

settingLarge online surveys in Japan before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

participantsA random sample of 25 482 individuals who are representatives of the Japanese population.

main outcome measureSelf-reported happiness measured using a 10-point Likert scale, where higher scores indicated higher levels of happiness. We defined participants with ≥8 on the scale as having high levels of happiness.

resultsAmong the 25 482 respondents, the median score of self-reported happiness was 7 (IQR 6-8), with 11 418 (45%) reporting high levels of happiness during the pandemic. The multivariable logistic regression model showed that meaning in life, having a spouse, trust in neighbours and female gender were positively associated with happiness (eg, adjusted OR (aOR) for meaning in life 4.17; 95% CI 3.92 to 4.43; p<0.001). Conversely, self-reported poor health, anxiety about future household income, psychiatric diseases except depression and feeling isolated were negatively associated with happiness (eg, aOR for self-reported poor health 0.44; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.48; p<0.001). Using machine-learning methods, we found that meaning in life and social capital (eg, having a spouse and trust in communities) were the strongest positive determinants of happiness, whereas poor health, anxiety about future household income and feeling isolated were important negative determinants of happiness. Among 6965 subjects who responded to questionnaires both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no systemic difference in the patterns as to determinants of declined happiness during the pandemic.

conclusionUsing machine-learning methods on data from large online surveys in Japan, we found that interventions that have a positive impact on social capital as well as successful pandemic control and economic stimuli may effectively improve the population-level psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHappinessHumansMachine LearningPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19MENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36526317
PMCPMC9764099
OpenAlexW4311686927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.