Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36526016›Full record

SynthesisVirus research2023

A systemic review of T-cell epitopes defined from the proteome of SARS-CoV-2.

Xiaoxiao Jin, Xiaotao Liu, Chuanlai Shen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Virus research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoxiao JinNorthern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China 225002; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 210009.
Xiaotao LiuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 210009.
Chuanlai ShenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China 210009. Electronic address: chuanlaishen@seu.edu.cn.
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CNSoutheast University · CNSoutheast University · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains in a global pandemic, and no eradicative therapy is currently available. Host T cells have been shown to play a crucial role in the antiviral immune protection and pathology in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients; thus, identifying sufficient T-cell epitopes from the SARS-CoV-2 proteome can contribute greatly to the development of T-cell epitope vaccines and the precise evaluation of host SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immunity. This review presents a comprehensive map of T-cell epitopes functionally validated from SARS-CoV-2 antigens, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) supertypes to present these epitopes, and the strategies to screen and identify T-cell epitopes. To the best of our knowledge, a total of 1349 CD8

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHLA AntigensHumansProteomeSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHLA AntigensProteomeSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2HLA restrictionSARS-CoV-2T-cell epitope

Identifiers

PMID36526016
PMCPMC9757803
OpenAlexW4313426556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.