ArticlePhysical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine2023
Development, validity, and test-retest reliability of a new neurocognitive functional performance test: The choice-reaction hop test.
Article in Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discussion on the validity of commonly used reliability indices in sports medicine and exercise science: a critical review with data simulations.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Review
- Targeting visual-sensory and cognitive impairments following lateral ankle sprains: a practical framework for functional assessment across the return-to-sport continuum-Part 1. Sensory reweighting and cognitive impairments: what are we really talking about and why clinicians should consider central alterations in return to sport criteria.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Review
- Targeting visual-sensory and cognitive impairments following lateral ankle sprains: a practical framework for functional assessment across the return-to-sport continuum. Part 2: from theory to practice: recommendations for optimizing return to sport after lateral ankle sprains using cognitive and visual-sensory assessments.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Enhancing Return to Alpine Skiing: Integrating Perceptual-Motor-Cognitive Considerations in Testing and Progressions: A Clinical Commentary.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo validate a choice-reaction hop test (CRHT) by assessing differences in timing versus the side-hop test (SHT), and to determine the CRHT's test-retest reliability.
designTest-retest reliability.
settingLaboratory.
participantsForty-nine healthy adults participated (16 female; age = 22.7 ± 3.4 years; height = 174.9 ± 9.1 cm; mass = 75.4 ± 14.8 kg).
main outcome measuresParticipants completed three trials each of the SHT and the CRHT in a counterbalanced order. Participants returned one-week later to repeat the CRHT. The fastest and the mean of the three trials were compared.
resultsParticipants took significantly longer to complete the CRHT (Mean across 3 trials = 21.4 ± 3.4s, Fastest trial = 19.7 ± 3.0s) compared to the traditional SHT (10.4 ± 2.0s, p < 0.001). The CRHT demonstrated good-excellent test-retest reliability across testing days for both the mean across 3 trials (r = 0.890, p < 0.001, SEM = 1.13) and the fastest trial (r = 0.828, p < 0.001, SEM = 1.24).
conclusionCompared to the SHT, the CRHT took longer to complete indicating its ability to stress neurocognitive function during an FPT. The CRHT demonstrated good-excellent test-retest reliability, which may allow it to be a useful measure in serial evaluations such as during rehabilitation benchmarking. The CRHT may be an effective FPT to assess combined physical and neurocognitive function to assist clinicians in evidence-based decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.