Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525296›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2022

Facebook Experiences of Users With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Think-Aloud Study.

Reihaneh Ahmadi, Hajin Lim, Bilge Mutlu, Melissa Duff, Catalina Toma, Lyn Turkstra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. What Is Shared in an Online Peer-Support Group Run by Stroke Survivors? An Exploratory Study With a Participatory Approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Reihaneh AhmadiDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-9179
Hajin LimDepartment of Communication, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-2144
Bilge MutluDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-1495
Melissa DuffDepartment of Hearing & Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-3634
Catalina TomaDepartment of Communication Arts, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-312X
Lyn TurkstraSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6948-6921
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USSeoul National University · KRVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Social perception and social communication in adults with traumatic brain injuryR01HD071089 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DUFF, MELISSA C, MUTLU, BILGE D · 2012 to 2022
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA critical gap in our knowledge about social media is whether we can alleviate accessibility barriers and challenges for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), to improve their social participation and health. To do this, we need real-time information about these barriers and challenges, to design appropriate aids.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to characterize the ways people with TBI accessed and used social media websites and understand unique challenges they faced.

methodsWe invited 8 adults with moderate to severe TBI to log onto their own Facebook page and use it as they regularly would while thinking aloud. Their comments were recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. We first analyzed participants' utterances using a priori coding based on a framework proposed by Meshi et al to classify adults' motives for accessing social media. We next used an open coding method to understand the challenges that people with TBI faced while using Facebook. In other words, we analyzed participants' needs for using Facebook and then identified Facebook features that made it challenging for them to meet those needs.

resultsParticipants used all categories of codes in the framework by Meshi et al and provided detailed feedback about the Facebook user interface. A priori coding revealed 2 dimensions that characterized participants' Facebook use: whether they were active or passive about posting and self-disclosure on Facebook and their familiarity and fluency in using Facebook. The open coding analysis revealed 6 types of challenges reported by participants with TBI, including difficulty with language production and interpretation, attention and information overload, perceptions of negativity and emotional contagion, insufficient guidance to use Facebook, concerns about web-based scams and frauds, and general accessibility concerns.

conclusionsResults showed that individuals with TBI used Facebook for the same reasons typical adults do, suggesting that it can help increase social communication and reduce isolation and loneliness. Participants also identified barriers, and we propose modifications that could improve access for individuals with brain injury. On the basis of identified functions and challenges, we conclude by proposing design ideas for social media support tools that can promote more active use of social media sites by adults with TBI.

Indexed as

cognitive communicationdisabilityrehabilitationsocial mediatraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36525296
PMCPMC9804090
OpenAlexW4313354143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.