Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525272›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Weight Loss in Patients With Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Perttu Lahtinen, Anne Juuti, Markku Luostarinen, Leo Niskanen, Tarja Liukkonen, Jyrki Tillonen, Jyrki Kössi, Vesa Ilvesmäki, Mikko Viljakka, Reetta Satokari and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03391817 (FAECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF MORBID OBESITY), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03391817 naunknown statusnot on this map

Faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of morbid obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorJoint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health CareRan2018 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsObesity, MorbidArmsFecal microbiota transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biopsychosocial and Environmental Factors That Impact Brain-Gut-Microbiome Interactions in Obesity.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Impact of bariatric surgery on gut microbiota in obese patients: A systematic review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation BeyondJournal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Review
  8. The gut microbiota in malnutrition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Health: From Dysbiosis to Therapeutics.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Using Gut Microbiota Modulation as a Precision Strategy Against Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Perttu LahtinenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Anne JuutiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Markku LuostarinenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Leo NiskanenDepartment of Endocrinology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Tarja LiukkonenDepartment of Nutrition, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Jyrki TillonenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Jyrki KössiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Vesa IlvesmäkiDepartment of Endocrinology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Mikko ViljakkaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Reetta SatokariHuman Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Perttu ArkkilaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Päijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Severe obesity is a major health concern. However, a few patients remain resistant to bariatric surgery and other treatments. Animal studies suggest that weight may be altered by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from a lean donor. Objective: To determine whether FMT from a lean donor reduces body weight and further improves the results of bariatric surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 2018 to 2021 among adult individuals with severe obesity treated at 2 bariatric surgery centers in Finland and included 18 months of follow-up. Patients eligible for bariatric surgery were recruited for the study. Data were analyzed from March 2021 to May 2022. Interventions: FMT from a lean donor or from the patient (autologous placebo) was administered by gastroscopy into the duodenum. Bariatric surgery was performed 6 months after the baseline intervention using laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was weight reduction measured as the percentage of total weight loss (TWL). Results: Forty-one patients were recruited to participate in the study and were included in the final analysis (29 women [71.1%]; mean [SD] age, 48.7 [8.7] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 42.5 [6.0]). A total of 21 patients received FMT from a lean donor, and 20 received an autologous placebo. Six months after FMT, 34 patients underwent LRYGB and 4 underwent LSG. Thirty-four patients (82.9%) attended the last visit 18 months after the baseline visit. The percentage of TWL at 6 months was 4.8% (95% CI, 2.7% to 7.0%; P < .001) in the FMT group and 4.6% (95% CI, 1.5% to 7.6%; P = .006) in the placebo group, but no difference was observed between the groups. At 18 months from the baseline (ie, 12 months after surgery), the percentage of TWL was 25.3% (95% CI, 19.5 to 31.1; P < .001) in the FMT group and 25.2% (95% CI, 20.2 to 30.3; P < .001) in the placebo group; however, no difference was observed between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: FMT did not affect presurgical and postsurgical weight loss. Further studies are needed to elucidate the possible role of FMT in obesity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03391817.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidFecal Microbiota TransplantationFemaleHumansObesityWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID36525272
PMCPMC9856235
OpenAlexW4312093773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.