ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022
Detectability of Plasma-Derived Circulating Tumor DNA Panel in Patients Undergoing Primary Treatment for Uveal Melanoma.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- National Coordinated Care and Translational Research Program for Uveal Melanoma Pilot: Infrastructure, Biobanking, and Challenges in Liquid Biopsy Implementation in a Latin American Country.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
- Circulating Tumor Cells in Uveal Melanoma: Multi-Marker Detection and Association With Disease State.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Blood-Based Cell-Free DNA in Ophthalmic Oncology.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy as a potential tool for diagnosis and clinical monitoring of cutaneous and uveal melanoma.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- [The "oncological trace": circulating tumor DNA in uveal melanomas].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- Comparative Single Vesicle Analysis of Aqueous Humor Extracellular Vesicles before and after Radiation in Uveal Melanoma Eyes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biomarker in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- The role of circulating tumor DNA in melanomas of the uveal tract.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Review
- Detection of metastases using circulating tumour DNA in uveal melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Release of Cell-Free Tumor DNA in the Plasma of Uveal Melanoma Patients Under Radiotherapy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- The Value of Detecting and Monitoring ctDNA in Uveal Melanoma: Results of a Pilot Study and a Systematic Review.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
- Plasma-Derived Cell-Free DNA for the Diagnosis of Ocular-Involving Histiocytosis.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the presence of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with uveal melanoma during and after primary tumor treatment. Methods: Detectability and variant allele frequency of ctDNA were assessed using a 129-oncogene panel using next-generation deep sequencing and hybridization capture in 69 patients with uveal melanoma undergoing primary treatment with enucleation (n = 8, during surgery) or plaque brachytherapy (n = 61; postoperative day 0, 1, 2, or 3). Follow-up assessments were performed in 39 patients over a median of 21 months (range, 3.2-31.9 months) of follow-up. Correlations between genomic data and disease parameters were performed. Results: Overall, ctDNA was detectable in 20 of 69 patients with uveal melanoma (28.9%) during the perioperative period. On the day of enucleation, ctDNA was detected in two of eight patients (25%). In patients undergoing brachytherapy, ctDNA was significantly more detectable on postoperative days 2 or 3 compared with postoperative day 0 or 1 (32.4% vs 0.0%; P = 0.0015). Patients with follow-up ctDNA that became detectable or had an increased variant allele frequency were significantly more likely to develop metastasis compared with patients with follow-up ctDNA that became undetectable or decreased variant allele frequency (P = 0.04). In patients with detectable vs. undetectable ctDNA, there was no significant difference in tumor size, stage or location. Conclusions: ctDNA is significantly more detectable at 48 to 72 hours after plaque brachytherapy compared with less than 48 hours. ctDNA can be detected during enucleation. Relative increases in ctDNA levels may herald the development of clinically apparent metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.