Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525237›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

The Efficacy Comparison of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: 6-Month Versus 12-Month Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty.

K Kozłowska-Petriczko, K M Pawlak, K Wojciechowska, A Reiter, Ł Błaszczyk, J Szełemej, J Petriczko, A Wiechowska-Kozłowska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K Kozłowska-PetriczkoTranslational Medicine Group, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland. kkpetriczko@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2429-4643
K M PawlakEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin, Poland.
K WojciechowskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
A ReiterEndoscopy Unit, Regional Health Center, Lubin, Poland.
Ł BłaszczykEndoscopy Unit, Sonomed Medical Centre, Szczecin, Poland.
J SzełemejEndoscopy Unit, Regional Health Center, Lubin, Poland.
J PetriczkoDepartment of Plastic, Endocrine and General Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
A Wiechowska-KozłowskaEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLMinistry of Interior and Administration · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntragastric balloon (IGB) insertion and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) are known to be effective and safe in achieving weight loss. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a 6-month IGB therapy, a 12-month IGB therapy, and ESG.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the weight loss at IGB (Orbera) removal after 6 months (124 patients), at IGB (Orbera365) removal after 12 months (61 patients) and at 6 and 12 months after ESG (42 and 34 patients, respectively). Postprocedural care, including medication and diet, was the same for all procedures.

resultsMean TBWL in patients undergoing IGB placement for 6 and 12 months and ESG after 6 and 12 months were 15.2, 15.8, 26.5, and 28.7 kg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean %TBWL in patients undergoing IGB placement for 6 or for 12 months (15.3% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.7). ESG patients showed a significantly higher mean %TBWL than IGB patients after 6 months (15.3 vs. 19.8, P = 0.005) and 12 months (14.7 vs. 22.5, P < 0.001).

conclusionAll three studied methods were effective for achieving weight loss. However, there was no significant difference between 6-month and 12-month IGB therapies outcomes. ESG appeared to be a more effective obesity treatment modality than IGB.

Indexed as

BariatricsGastric BalloonGastroplastyObesity, MorbidHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossEndoscopic bariatric therapyEndoscopic sleeve gastroplastyIntragastric balloonObesity managementOrbera 365

Identifiers

PMID36525237
PMCPMC9889469
OpenAlexW4311664143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.