Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525202›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

Attentional capture is modulated by stimulus saliency in visual search as evidenced by event-related potentials and alpha oscillations.

Norman Forschack, Christopher Gundlach, Steven Hillyard, Matthias M Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Signal suppression makes search less effortful.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Separate Cue- and Alpha-Related Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norman ForschackExperimental Psychology and Methods, Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. norman.forschack@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-7059
Christopher GundlachExperimental Psychology and Methods, Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-0715
Steven HillyardUniversity of California, San Diego, and Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Matthias M MüllerExperimental Psychology and Methods, Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MU 972/29-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used a typical four-item search display to investigate top-down control over attentional capture in an additional singleton paradigm. By manipulating target and distractor color and shape, stimulus saliency relative to the remaining items was systematically varied. One group of participants discriminated the side of a dot within a salient orange target (ST group) presented with green circles (fillers) and a green diamond distractor. A second group discriminated the side of the dot within a green diamond target presented with green circle fillers and a salient orange square distractor (SD group). Results showed faster reaction times and a shorter latency of the N2pc component in the event-related potential (ERP) to the more salient targets in the ST group. Both salient and less salient distractors elicited Pd components of equal amplitude. Behaviorally, no task interference was observed with the less salient distractor, indicating the prevention of attentional capture. However, reaction times were slower in the presence of the salient distractor, which conflicts with the hypothesis that the Pd reflects proactive distractor suppression. Contrary to recent proposals that elicitation of the Pd requires competitive interactions with a target, we found a greater Pd amplitude when the distractor was presented alone. Alpha-band amplitudes decreased during target processing (event-related desynchronization), but no significant amplitude enhancement was observed at electrodes contralateral to distractors regardless of their saliency. The results demonstrate independent neural mechanisms for target and distractor processing and support the view that top-down guidance of attention can be offset (counteracted) by relative stimulus saliency.

Indexed as

AttentionEvoked PotentialsDiamondElectroencephalographyHumansReaction TimeVisual PerceptionDiamondAttentional captureCognitive and attentional controlElectrophysiology

Identifiers

PMID36525202
PMCPMC10066093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.