Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525171›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2023

Canine model of electrical conduction recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation constructed by CARTO3 and preliminary application evaluation of DOX-L.

Ying Zhuge, Gonghao Li, Yulong Ge, Jiajia Zhang, Xiaoqiang Liu, Junshan Wang, Fang Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prospective study of zero-fluoroscopy laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation for the management of atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ying Zhuge *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Gonghao Li *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yulong GeDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiajia ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqiang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junshan WangShanghai Tenth Peoples Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. onlyfang1@163.com.
Nanjing Medical University · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CNEast China University of Science and Technology · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Society for Epidemiologic Research Doctoral Dissertation WorkshopR13TR002021 · NCATS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HARLOW, BERNARD L · 2017 to 2018
$46k
National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870245National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070334Science and technology innovation project of Shanghai Chongming District Science and Technology Commission CKY2020-5Science and Technology Tackling Project of Shanghai Songjiang District Science and Technology Commission 2020SJ288the National Major Science and Technology Infrastructure for Translational Medicine Open Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University TMSK-2021-149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is widely used to treat arrhythmias. However, for atrial fibrillation, the recurrence rate after RFCA is still high. The development of an animal model that mimics the recurrence of electrical conduction after ablation is essential before we can explore the mechanisms involved or develop new therapeutic strategies.

methodsEighteen beagles aged 12 to 24 months were randomly assigned to this study. RFCA ablation of the right atrial free wall was performed. Then, electrical block and conduction recovery in the ablation area were evaluated using voltage mapping and pacing tests assisted by CARTO3 system. Finally, liposome doxorubicin (DOX-L) was intravenously injected after ablation to investigate the effect of DOX-L on this animal model.

resultsThe conduction block (CB) rates at 5 min after ablation were 16.7%, 83.3%, and 100%, corresponding to 30w, 35w, and 40w power, respectively. However, after 20 min, the rate of CB was 0%, 33.3%, and 75%; thus, the combined success rate of CB and conduction recurrence was 16.7%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. The optimal ablation parameter is 35 W for 20 s, based on the CB rate, REC rate. After 10 days of ablation, the residual conduction recurrence rate was as high as 83.3% in the RFCA alone group, whereas there was no recurrence with RFCA combined with DOX-L treatment.

conclusionsThe novel model accurately simulated the electrical conduction recurrence after cardiac radiofrequency ablation. RFCA combined with DOX-L treatment dramatically reduces the recurrence rate of electrical conduction after ablation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationAnimalsDogsDoxorubicinHeart AtriaHeart RateTreatment OutcomeDoxorubicinCanine modelCARTO 3Electrical conduction recurrenceLiposome doxorubicinRadiofrequency catheter ablation

Identifiers

PMID36525171
OpenAlexW4311671611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.