Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525118›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2022

A Skill Acquisition Perspective on the Impact of Exergaming Technology on Foundational Movement Skill Development in Children 3-12 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Luca Oppici, Frederike Marie Stell, Till Utesch, Carl T Woods, Lawrence Foweather, James R Rudd

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Flag for Our Time: In Correspondence with van der Kamp.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  13. On a Corresponsive Sport Science.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Luca OppiciThe Department of Teacher Education and Outdoor Studies, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Frederike Marie StellInstitute of Communication and Media Research, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Till UteschInstitute of Educational Sciences, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Carl T WoodsInstitute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lawrence FoweatherResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
James R RuddThe Department of Teacher Education and Outdoor Studies, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. jamesr@nih.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-576X
German Sport University Cologne · DELiverpool John Moores University · GBNorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Münster · DEVictoria University · AUWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - EXC 2050/1 - Project ID 390696704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary, digital screen time in children represents a major concern due to its detrimental effect on children's development. Nowadays, however, advances in technology allow children to actively interact with a digital screen using their whole body (e.g., exergaming), providing potential for movement learning. Exergaming technology may prove valuable in supporting children's development of foundational movement skills (FMS).

objectiveTo examine the impact of exergaming technology on the development of FMS in children 3-12 years through a skill acquisition lens.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus databases were searched between 2007 and 2022. Studies were eligible if they conducted an exergaming intervention to improve FMS in typically developing children aged three to twelve with a control group, using a baseline and post-intervention assessment design. FMS outcomes were pooled with a random effects model.

resultsNine trials (4 RCTs, 2 cluster RCTs and 3 non-randomized trials) of varying methodological quality (2 had low, 6 had some concerns, and 1 had a high risk of bias) were included, with a total of 783 participants. FMS outcome measures across studies comprised object control skills, locomotor skills, coordination, agility, balance and balance-related skills. The meta-analysis included showed a small positive effect in favor of the exergaming intervention (r = 0.24 [95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.36]).

conclusionOur results indicate that screen-based technology that requires an active engagement of the child can promote the development of FMS. Considering that FMS are the foundation of a child's physical, mental, health and academic development, this finding could lead to a reshaping of the perception of digital screen-based technology and the role this should play in children's lives. We speculate that the observed benefits most likely depend upon the quality of information-movement coupling specificity and the motor learning strategies built into the exergame and/or the intervention design. We do not believe this is dependent on the type of FMS being performed or the amount of practice. We recommend therefore that future research should examine how practitioners (school teachers, coaches and parents) can facilitate the interaction between a child and exergaming technology.

Indexed as

ExergamingFoundational movement skillsFundamental movement skillsMotor competenceSkill acquisitionTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36525118
PMCPMC9756923
OpenAlexW4312178067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.